PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QDEL vs. CMCSA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

QDEL vs. CMCSA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Quidel Corporation (QDEL) and Comcast Corporation (CMCSA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QDEL achieves a -36.03% return, which is significantly lower than CMCSA's -7.64% return. Over the past 10 years, QDEL has underperformed CMCSA with an annualized return of -1.00%, while CMCSA has yielded a comparatively higher 0.28% annualized return.


QDEL

1D
4.76%
1M
29.30%
6M
-45.70%
YTD
-36.03%
1Y
-39.78%
3Y*
-40.42%
5Y*
-31.71%
10Y*
-1.00%

CMCSA

1D
0.96%
1M
-2.49%
6M
-13.81%
YTD
-7.64%
1Y
-20.26%
3Y*
-10.91%
5Y*
-11.60%
10Y*
0.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QDEL vs. CMCSA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QDEL
Quidel Corporation
-36.03%-35.89%-39.55%-13.97%-36.54%-24.86%139.44%53.69%12.62%102.38%
CMCSA
Comcast Corporation
-7.64%-17.35%-11.84%29.08%-28.68%-2.22%19.13%34.04%-12.71%17.45%

Correlation

The correlation between QDEL and CMCSA is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 1992

0.16

Fundamentals

Market Cap

QDEL:

$1.25B

CMCSA:

$84.20B

EPS

QDEL:

-$17.81

CMCSA:

$5.08

PS Ratio

QDEL:

0.47

CMCSA:

0.69

PB Ratio

QDEL:

0.67

CMCSA:

0.97

Total Revenue (TTM)

QDEL:

$2.66B

CMCSA:

$125.28B

Gross Profit (TTM)

QDEL:

$1.50B

CMCSA:

$77.26B

EBITDA (TTM)

QDEL:

-$662.00M

CMCSA:

$45.00B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QDEL vs. CMCSA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QDEL
QDEL Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
QDEL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDEL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDEL Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
QDEL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDEL Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

CMCSA
CMCSA Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
CMCSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMCSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMCSA Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
CMCSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMCSA Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QDEL vs. CMCSA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Quidel Corporation (QDEL) and Comcast Corporation (CMCSA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QDELCMCSADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

0.89

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.59

-0.70

+0.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.11

-1.34

+0.23

QDEL vs. CMCSA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QDEL Sharpe Ratio is -0.50, which is higher than the CMCSA Sharpe Ratio of -0.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QDEL and CMCSA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QDEL vs. CMCSA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QDEL drawdown since its inception was -96.70%, which is greater than CMCSA's maximum drawdown of -67.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDEL and CMCSA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QDELCMCSADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.70%

-67.89%

-28.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-71.85%

-30.48%

-41.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-88.76%

-41.39%

-47.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-94.30%

-52.61%

-41.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-96.70%

-52.61%

-44.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-93.95%

-49.28%

-44.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-40.28%

-24.67%

-15.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

38.37%

15.87%

+22.50%

Volatility

QDEL vs. CMCSA - Volatility Comparison

Quidel Corporation (QDEL) has a higher volatility of 35.15% compared to Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) at 8.64%. This indicates that QDEL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CMCSA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QDELCMCSADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

35.15%

8.64%

+26.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

71.49%

23.74%

+47.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

85.29%

29.99%

+55.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

61.98%

27.12%

+34.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

58.72%

26.58%

+32.14%

Dividends

QDEL vs. CMCSA - Dividend Comparison

QDEL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CMCSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.40%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CMCSA
Comcast Corporation
12.40%4.35%3.25%2.60%3.03%1.95%1.72%1.40%2.69%1.18%1.96%1.73%
QDEL
Quidel Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

QDEL vs. CMCSA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Quidel Corporation and Comcast Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B30.00B35.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
619.80M
31.46B
(QDEL) Total Revenue
(CMCSA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

QDEL vs. CMCSA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Quidel Corporation and Comcast Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
92.5%
65.4%
Portfolio components
QDEL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Quidel Corporation reported a gross profit of 573.00M and revenue of 619.80M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 92.5%.

CMCSA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Comcast Corporation reported a gross profit of 20.57B and revenue of 31.46B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 65.4%.

QDEL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Quidel Corporation reported an operating income of -31.80M and revenue of 619.80M, resulting in an operating margin of -5.1%.

CMCSA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Comcast Corporation reported an operating income of 4.14B and revenue of 31.46B, resulting in an operating margin of 13.1%.

QDEL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Quidel Corporation reported a net income of -91.80M and revenue of 619.80M, resulting in a net margin of -14.8%.

CMCSA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Comcast Corporation reported a net income of 2.17B and revenue of 31.46B, resulting in a net margin of 6.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


QDEL and CMCSA have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QDEL has higher volatility (35.15%) compared to CMCSA (8.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QDEL dropped -96.70% vs CMCSA's -67.89%.

QDEL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.49 vs -0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QDEL and CMCSA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer