QDEC vs. IQQ
QDEC (FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF – December) and IQQ (iShares Nasdaq 100 ETF) are both Nasdaq-100 funds. QDEC is actively managed, while IQQ is passively managed. Their 0.98 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. QDEC charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for IQQ.
Performance
QDEC vs. IQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
QDEC
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- -0.28%
- 6M
- 7.23%
- YTD
- 8.08%
- 1Y
- 19.47%
- 3Y*
- 15.79%
- 5Y*
- 9.74%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 10.75%
IQQ
- 1D
- 0.61%
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $29.72M | $37.50M | $37.50M | |
| $1.40M | $874.77K | $1.05M |
QDEC vs. IQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
QDEC FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF – December | -0.46% |
IQQ iShares Nasdaq 100 ETF | -4.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between QDEC and IQQ is 0.98 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2026 | 0.98 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QDEC vs. IQQ — Risk / Return Rank
QDEC
IQQ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
QDEC vs. IQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF – December (QDEC) and iShares Nasdaq 100 ETF (IQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QDEC | IQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.36 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.65 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QDEC vs. IQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QDEC drawdown since its inception was -25.25%, which is greater than IQQ's maximum drawdown of -8.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDEC and IQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QDEC | IQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.25% | -8.80% | -16.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.58% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.08% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.25% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.54% | -5.21% | +3.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.92% | -3.69% | -1.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.68% | — | — |
Volatility
QDEC vs. IQQ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QDEC | IQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.25% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.31% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.47% | 23.03% | -12.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.80% | 23.03% | -8.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.53% | 23.03% | -8.50% |
QDEC vs. IQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
QDEC has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than IQQ's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
QDEC vs. IQQ - Dividend Comparison
Neither QDEC nor IQQ has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, QDEC and IQQ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, IQQ is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IQQ is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for QDEC.
QDEC and IQQ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for QDEC and 0.10% for IQQ.
Find the right allocation for QDEC and IQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer