PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QDAY.NEO vs. SOXS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QDAY.NEO vs. SOXS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Hamilton EnhancedTechnology DayMAX™ ETF (QDAY.NEO) and Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3x Shares (SOXS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

QDAY.NEO is traded in CAD, while SOXS is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SOXS values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QDAY.NEO achieves a 30.27% return, which is significantly higher than SOXS's -93.52% return.


QDAY.NEO

1D
3.63%
1M
7.22%
YTD
30.27%
6M
31.66%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SOXS

1D
-16.37%
1M
-56.46%
YTD
-93.52%
6M
-93.88%
1Y
-97.93%
3Y*
-86.70%
5Y*
-80.02%
10Y*
-79.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QDAY.NEO vs. SOXS - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between QDAY.NEO and SOXS is -0.78, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2025

-0.78

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QDAY.NEO vs. SOXS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QDAY.NEO

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


SOXS
SOXS Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
SOXS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SOXS Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
SOXS Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
SOXS Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
SOXS Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QDAY.NEO vs. SOXS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hamilton EnhancedTechnology DayMAX™ ETF (QDAY.NEO) and Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3x Shares (SOXS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QDAY.NEOSOXSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.61

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-1.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.48

QDAY.NEO vs. SOXS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QDAY.NEO vs. SOXS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QDAY.NEO drawdown since its inception was -19.44%, smaller than the maximum SOXS drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDAY.NEO and SOXS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QDAY.NEOSOXSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.44%

-100.00%

+80.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-97.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-99.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-99.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-100.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.97%

-100.00%

+99.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.23%

-92.77%

+87.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

67.69%

Volatility

QDAY.NEO vs. SOXS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QDAY.NEOSOXSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

59.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

96.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.37%

112.61%

-88.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.37%

110.35%

-85.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.37%

101.78%

-77.41%

QDAY.NEO vs. SOXS - Expense Ratio Comparison

QDAY.NEO has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than SOXS's 1.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

QDAY.NEO vs. SOXS - Dividend Comparison

QDAY.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.91%, less than SOXS's 84.95% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
QDAY.NEO
Hamilton EnhancedTechnology DayMAX™ ETF
14.91%8.78%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SOXS
Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3x Shares
84.95%10.79%5.45%9.22%0.19%0.00%3.58%2.30%0.76%

Frequently Asked Questions


QDAY.NEO and SOXS have a correlation of -0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, QDAY.NEO is cheaper at 0.85% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QDAY.NEO is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 1.08% for SOXS.

QDAY.NEO is categorized as Derivative Income, while SOXS is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: Hamilton Capital and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for QDAY.NEO and 1.08% for SOXS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QDAY.NEO and SOXS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer