PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QDAY.NEO vs. HBTE.NEO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QDAY.NEO vs. HBTE.NEO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Hamilton EnhancedTechnology DayMAX™ ETF (QDAY.NEO) and Harvest Bitcoin Leaders Enhanced Income ETF (HBTE.NEO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QDAY.NEO achieves a 26.01% return, which is significantly lower than HBTE.NEO's 28.08% return.


QDAY.NEO

1D
1.20%
1M
3.71%
YTD
26.01%
6M
26.05%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HBTE.NEO

1D
2.94%
1M
4.14%
YTD
28.08%
6M
14.49%
1Y
67.21%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QDAY.NEO vs. HBTE.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between QDAY.NEO and HBTE.NEO is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2025

0.55

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QDAY.NEO vs. HBTE.NEO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QDAY.NEO

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


HBTE.NEO
HBTE.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
HBTE.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HBTE.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
HBTE.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
HBTE.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
HBTE.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QDAY.NEO vs. HBTE.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hamilton EnhancedTechnology DayMAX™ ETF (QDAY.NEO) and Harvest Bitcoin Leaders Enhanced Income ETF (HBTE.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QDAY.NEOHBTE.NEODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.19

QDAY.NEO vs. HBTE.NEO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QDAY.NEO vs. HBTE.NEO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QDAY.NEO drawdown since its inception was -19.44%, smaller than the maximum HBTE.NEO drawdown of -55.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDAY.NEO and HBTE.NEO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QDAY.NEOHBTE.NEODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.44%

-55.67%

+36.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-55.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.21%

-24.58%

+20.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.25%

-21.15%

+15.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

28.79%

Volatility

QDAY.NEO vs. HBTE.NEO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QDAY.NEOHBTE.NEODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

50.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.16%

66.62%

-42.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.16%

66.35%

-42.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.16%

66.35%

-42.19%

QDAY.NEO vs. HBTE.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison

QDAY.NEO has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than HBTE.NEO's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

QDAY.NEO vs. HBTE.NEO - Dividend Comparison

QDAY.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.53%, less than HBTE.NEO's 26.16% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


QDAY.NEO and HBTE.NEO have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HBTE.NEO is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HBTE.NEO is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for QDAY.NEO.

QDAY.NEO is categorized as Derivative Income, while HBTE.NEO is Leveraged Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: Hamilton Capital and Harvest. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for QDAY.NEO and 0.75% for HBTE.NEO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QDAY.NEO and HBTE.NEO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer