PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HBTE.NEO vs. BLOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HBTE.NEO vs. BLOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Harvest Bitcoin Leaders Enhanced Income ETF (HBTE.NEO) and Nicholas Crypto Income ETF (BLOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

HBTE.NEO is traded in CAD, while BLOX is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BLOX values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HBTE.NEO achieves a 26.29% return, which is significantly higher than BLOX's 17.18% return.


HBTE.NEO

1D
-2.27%
1M
4.71%
YTD
26.29%
6M
4.53%
1Y
59.88%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BLOX

1D
-0.70%
1M
8.06%
YTD
17.18%
6M
2.07%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HBTE.NEO vs. BLOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
HBTE.NEO
Harvest Bitcoin Leaders Enhanced Income ETF
26.29%30.65%
BLOX
Nicholas Crypto Income ETF
17.18%9.62%

Correlation

The correlation between HBTE.NEO and BLOX is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2025

0.85

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HBTE.NEO vs. BLOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HBTE.NEO
HBTE.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
HBTE.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HBTE.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
HBTE.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
HBTE.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
HBTE.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

BLOX
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HBTE.NEO vs. BLOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Bitcoin Leaders Enhanced Income ETF (HBTE.NEO) and Nicholas Crypto Income ETF (BLOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HBTE.NEOBLOXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.10

HBTE.NEO vs. BLOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HBTE.NEOBLOXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.37

0.57

+0.80

Drawdowns

HBTE.NEO vs. BLOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HBTE.NEO drawdown since its inception was -55.75%, which is greater than BLOX's maximum drawdown of -47.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HBTE.NEO and BLOX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HBTE.NEOBLOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.75%

-47.44%

-8.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-55.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.65%

-20.69%

-4.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.04%

-19.15%

-1.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

28.56%

Volatility

HBTE.NEO vs. BLOX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HBTE.NEOBLOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

50.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

66.70%

52.62%

+14.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

66.71%

52.62%

+14.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

66.71%

52.62%

+14.09%

HBTE.NEO vs. BLOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HBTE.NEO has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than BLOX's 1.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

HBTE.NEO vs. BLOX - Dividend Comparison

HBTE.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 26.49%, less than BLOX's 37.11% yield.


PositionTTM2025
BLOX
Nicholas Crypto Income ETF
37.11%22.69%
HBTE.NEO
Harvest Bitcoin Leaders Enhanced Income ETF
26.49%18.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


HBTE.NEO and BLOX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HBTE.NEO is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HBTE.NEO is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for BLOX.

HBTE.NEO is categorized as Leveraged Cryptocurrency, while BLOX is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: Harvest and Nicholas. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for HBTE.NEO and 1.03% for BLOX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HBTE.NEO and BLOX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer