HBTE.NEO vs. BLOX
HBTE.NEO (Harvest Bitcoin Leaders Enhanced Income ETF) and BLOX (Nicholas Crypto Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HBTE.NEO is a Leveraged Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Harvest, while BLOX is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Nicholas. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HBTE.NEO charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.03%/yr for BLOX.
Performance
HBTE.NEO vs. BLOX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
HBTE.NEO is traded in CAD, while BLOX is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BLOX values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HBTE.NEO achieves a 26.29% return, which is significantly higher than BLOX's 17.18% return.
HBTE.NEO
- 1D
- -2.27%
- 1M
- 4.71%
- YTD
- 26.29%
- 6M
- 4.53%
- 1Y
- 59.88%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BLOX
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 8.06%
- YTD
- 17.18%
- 6M
- 2.07%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HBTE.NEO vs. BLOX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HBTE.NEO Harvest Bitcoin Leaders Enhanced Income ETF | 26.29% | 30.65% |
BLOX Nicholas Crypto Income ETF | 17.18% | 9.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between HBTE.NEO and BLOX is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2025 | 0.85 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HBTE.NEO vs. BLOX — Risk / Return Rank
HBTE.NEO
BLOX
HBTE.NEO vs. BLOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Bitcoin Leaders Enhanced Income ETF (HBTE.NEO) and Nicholas Crypto Income ETF (BLOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HBTE.NEO | BLOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.08 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.10 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HBTE.NEO | BLOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.37 | 0.57 | +0.80 |
Drawdowns
HBTE.NEO vs. BLOX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HBTE.NEO drawdown since its inception was -55.75%, which is greater than BLOX's maximum drawdown of -47.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HBTE.NEO and BLOX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HBTE.NEO | BLOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.75% | -47.44% | -8.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -55.75% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.65% | -20.69% | -4.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.04% | -19.15% | -1.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 28.56% | — | — |
Volatility
HBTE.NEO vs. BLOX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HBTE.NEO | BLOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.53% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 50.20% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 66.70% | 52.62% | +14.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 66.71% | 52.62% | +14.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 66.71% | 52.62% | +14.09% |
HBTE.NEO vs. BLOX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HBTE.NEO has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than BLOX's 1.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
HBTE.NEO vs. BLOX - Dividend Comparison
HBTE.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 26.49%, less than BLOX's 37.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BLOX Nicholas Crypto Income ETF | 37.11% | 22.69% |
HBTE.NEO Harvest Bitcoin Leaders Enhanced Income ETF | 26.49% | 18.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HBTE.NEO and BLOX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HBTE.NEO is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HBTE.NEO is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for BLOX.
HBTE.NEO is categorized as Leveraged Cryptocurrency, while BLOX is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: Harvest and Nicholas. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for HBTE.NEO and 1.03% for BLOX.
Find the right allocation for HBTE.NEO and BLOX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer