QCON vs. FDG

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

QCON (American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF) and FDG (American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QCON is a Corporate Bonds fund actively managed by American Century, while FDG is a Global Equities fund actively managed by American Century. Both are actively managed. QCON charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for FDG.

Performance

QCON vs. FDG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF (QCON) and American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF (FDG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

QCON

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FDG

• 1D: 1.71%
• 1M: 5.58%
• YTD: 9.35%
• 6M: 10.53%
• 1Y: 32.97%
• 3Y*: 29.96%
• 5Y*: 12.99%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QCON vs. FDG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
QCON American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF	0.00%
FDG American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF	15.18%

QCON vs. FDG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QCON	FDG
Financial Services	7.9%	4.7%
Utilities	1.5%	0.1%
Industrials	1.0%	5.2%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	21.5%
Consumer Cyclical	-	17.1%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	0.6%
Healthcare	-	13.2%
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	37.7%

Return for Risk

QCON vs. FDG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDG

FDG Risk / Return Rank: 50
FDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
FDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
FDG Omega Ratio Rank: 52
FDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
FDG Martin Ratio Rank: 46

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QCON vs. FDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF (QCON) and American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF (FDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QCON	FDG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.86	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.53	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.93	—

Drawdowns

QCON vs. FDG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QCON drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum FDG drawdown of -43.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QCON and FDG.

Drawdown Indicators

	QCON	FDG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-43.69%	+43.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-15.71%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-26.14%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-43.69%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.48%	+1.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-13.42%	+13.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	4.45%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	QCON	FDG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	5.38%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	14.12%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.00%	17.84%	-17.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.00%	24.67%	-24.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.00%	24.90%	-24.90%

QCON vs. FDG - Expense Ratio Comparison

QCON has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than FDG's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

QCON vs. FDG - Dividend Comparison

Neither QCON nor FDG has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
FDG American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.01%
QCON American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, QCON or FDG?

On fees, QCON is cheaper at 0.32% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, QCON or FDG?

QCON is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for FDG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QCON or FDG?

QCON and FDG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between QCON and FDG?

QCON is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while FDG is Global Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for QCON and 0.45% for FDG.