PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QCOM vs. TOELY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

QCOM vs. TOELY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) and Tokyo Electron ADR (TOELY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QCOM achieves a 25.03% return, which is significantly lower than TOELY's 95.90% return. Over the past 10 years, QCOM has underperformed TOELY with an annualized return of 18.10%, while TOELY has yielded a comparatively higher 34.30% annualized return.


QCOM

1D
4.32%
1M
5.47%
YTD
25.03%
6M
19.95%
1Y
39.72%
3Y*
22.00%
5Y*
11.87%
10Y*
18.10%

TOELY

1D
2.93%
1M
35.96%
YTD
95.90%
6M
124.61%
1Y
164.27%
3Y*
46.47%
5Y*
25.12%
10Y*
34.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QCOM vs. TOELY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QCOM
QUALCOMM Incorporated
25.03%13.84%8.31%35.07%-38.58%22.25%77.08%60.76%-7.59%2.05%
TOELY
Tokyo Electron ADR
95.90%49.57%-14.19%82.22%-49.18%53.76%71.31%94.00%-38.01%94.67%

Correlation

The correlation between QCOM and TOELY is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2009

0.36

The correlation between QCOM and TOELY shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (all time) to 0.52 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

QCOM:

$226.96B

TOELY:

$199.47B

EPS

QCOM:

$9.11

TOELY:

¥632.07

PE Ratio

QCOM:

23.23

TOELY:

55.16

PS Ratio

QCOM:

5.18

TOELY:

12.98

PB Ratio

QCOM:

8.32

TOELY:

15.37

Total Revenue (TTM)

QCOM:

$44.49B

TOELY:

¥2.47T

Gross Profit (TTM)

QCOM:

$24.38B

TOELY:

¥1.12T

EBITDA (TTM)

QCOM:

$12.92B

TOELY:

¥753.39B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QCOM vs. TOELY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QCOM
QCOM Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
QCOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QCOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
QCOM Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
QCOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
QCOM Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

TOELY
TOELY Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
TOELY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TOELY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
TOELY Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
TOELY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
TOELY Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QCOM vs. TOELY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) and Tokyo Electron ADR (TOELY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QCOMTOELYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.40

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.10

4.94

-3.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.44

12.36

-9.92

QCOM vs. TOELY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QCOM Sharpe Ratio is 0.75, which is lower than the TOELY Sharpe Ratio of 2.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QCOM and TOELY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QCOM vs. TOELY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QCOM drawdown since its inception was -86.75%, smaller than the maximum TOELY drawdown of -92.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QCOM and TOELY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QCOMTOELYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.75%

-92.92%

+6.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.13%

-30.30%

-2.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-44.23%

-53.52%

+9.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.29%

-59.40%

+15.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.29%

-59.40%

+15.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.34%

0.00%

-15.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.87%

-49.60%

+16.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.89%

12.12%

+2.77%

Volatility

QCOM vs. TOELY - Volatility Comparison

QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) has a higher volatility of 27.32% compared to Tokyo Electron ADR (TOELY) at 20.95%. This indicates that QCOM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TOELY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QCOMTOELYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

27.32%

20.95%

+6.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

42.18%

40.27%

+1.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

48.52%

54.00%

-5.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

41.17%

44.98%

-3.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.28%

39.68%

-0.40%

Dividends

QCOM vs. TOELY - Dividend Comparison

QCOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.70%, while TOELY has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QCOM
QUALCOMM Incorporated
1.70%2.06%2.18%2.18%2.67%1.47%1.69%2.81%4.27%3.50%3.17%3.72%
TOELY
Tokyo Electron ADR
0.00%1.02%1.17%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.11%2.27%0.00%

Financials

QCOM vs. TOELY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between QUALCOMM Incorporated and Tokyo Electron ADR. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00B400.00B600.00B800.00B20222023202420252026
10.60B
724.89B
(QCOM) Total Revenue
(TOELY) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. QCOM values in USD, TOELY values in JPY

QCOM vs. TOELY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between QUALCOMM Incorporated and Tokyo Electron ADR over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%45.0%50.0%55.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
53.8%
46.8%
Portfolio components
QCOM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, QUALCOMM Incorporated reported a gross profit of 5.70B and revenue of 10.60B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 53.8%.

TOELY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tokyo Electron ADR reported a gross profit of 339.31B and revenue of 724.89B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 46.8%.

QCOM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, QUALCOMM Incorporated reported an operating income of 2.31B and revenue of 10.60B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.8%.

TOELY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tokyo Electron ADR reported an operating income of 209.42B and revenue of 724.89B, resulting in an operating margin of 28.9%.

QCOM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, QUALCOMM Incorporated reported a net income of 7.37B and revenue of 10.60B, resulting in a net margin of 69.5%.

TOELY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tokyo Electron ADR reported a net income of 218.23B and revenue of 724.89B, resulting in a net margin of 30.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


QCOM and TOELY have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QCOM has higher volatility (27.32%) compared to TOELY (20.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QCOM dropped -86.75% vs TOELY's -92.92%.

TOELY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.77 vs 0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QCOM and TOELY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer