PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QCN.TO vs. QSB.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QCN.TO vs. QSB.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Mackenzie Canadian Equity Index ETF (QCN.TO) and Mackenzie Canadian Short-Term Bond Index ETF (QSB.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QCN.TO achieves a 12.66% return, which is significantly higher than QSB.TO's 1.24% return.


QCN.TO

1D
-1.20%
1M
1.50%
6M
7.44%
YTD
12.66%
1Y
31.20%
3Y*
23.22%
5Y*
15.13%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.83%

QSB.TO

1D
-0.03%
1M
-0.18%
6M
0.81%
YTD
1.24%
1Y
2.89%
3Y*
4.94%
5Y*
2.15%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
2.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CA$1.84MCA$2.16MCA$1.87M
CA$43.43KCA$34.13KCA$191.48K

QCN.TO vs. QSB.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
QCN.TO
Mackenzie Canadian Equity Index ETF
12.66%31.83%21.95%11.28%-5.45%24.65%5.84%24.53%-10.84%
QSB.TO
Mackenzie Canadian Short-Term Bond Index ETF
1.24%3.74%5.59%5.22%-3.90%-1.16%4.58%4.15%0.90%

Correlation

The correlation between QCN.TO and QSB.TO is 0.32, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 29, 2018

0.11

Over the past year, QCN.TO and QSB.TO have become more correlated (0.32) than their long-term average of 0.11, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QCN.TO vs. QSB.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QCN.TO
QCN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
QCN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QCN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
QCN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
QCN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
QCN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

QSB.TO
QSB.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
QSB.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QSB.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
QSB.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
QSB.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
QSB.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QCN.TO vs. QSB.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mackenzie Canadian Equity Index ETF (QCN.TO) and Mackenzie Canadian Short-Term Bond Index ETF (QSB.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QCN.TOQSB.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.29

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.32

2.30

+1.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.07

7.59

+7.48

QCN.TO vs. QSB.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QCN.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is higher than the QSB.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QCN.TO and QSB.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QCN.TO vs. QSB.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QCN.TO drawdown since its inception was -36.90%, which is greater than QSB.TO's maximum drawdown of -6.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QCN.TO and QSB.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QCN.TOQSB.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.90%

-6.73%

-30.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.43%

-1.26%

-8.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.26%

-1.26%

-11.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.37%

-6.72%

-9.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.20%

-0.29%

-0.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.62%

-1.14%

-2.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.08%

0.38%

+1.70%

Volatility

QCN.TO vs. QSB.TO - Volatility Comparison

Mackenzie Canadian Equity Index ETF (QCN.TO) has a higher volatility of 2.88% compared to Mackenzie Canadian Short-Term Bond Index ETF (QSB.TO) at 0.52%. This indicates that QCN.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QSB.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QCN.TOQSB.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.88%

0.52%

+2.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.05%

1.61%

+9.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.46%

2.04%

+11.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.21%

2.57%

+10.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.65%

2.45%

+13.20%

QCN.TO vs. QSB.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

QCN.TO has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than QSB.TO's 0.09% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

QCN.TO vs. QSB.TO - Dividend Comparison

QCN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.95%, less than QSB.TO's 2.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
QCN.TO
Mackenzie Canadian Equity Index ETF
1.95%2.19%2.74%3.37%3.26%2.45%3.03%3.07%2.73%
QSB.TO
Mackenzie Canadian Short-Term Bond Index ETF
2.83%2.96%3.13%2.63%2.02%2.21%1.60%2.22%1.91%

Frequently Asked Questions


QCN.TO and QSB.TO have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, QCN.TO is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QCN.TO is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for QSB.TO.

QCN.TO is categorized as Canada Equities, while QSB.TO is Short-Term Bond. QCN.TO tracks Solactive Canada Broad Market Index, while QSB.TO tracks Solactive Canadian Select Short-Term Bond Index. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for QCN.TO and 0.09% for QSB.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QCN.TO and QSB.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer