QCML vs. MUU

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

QCML (GraniteShares 2x Long QCOM Daily ETF) and MUU (Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds - QCML tracks the Qualcomm Inc. (QCOM) while MUU tracks the Micron Technology, Inc. (200% Daily). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, QCML returned -2.10% vs 3397.63% for MUU. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QCML charges 1.50%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for MUU.

Performance

QCML vs. MUU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long QCOM Daily ETF (QCML) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QCML achieves a -14.75% return, which is significantly lower than MUU's 640.02% return.

QCML

• 1D: -6.01%
• 1M: -32.15%
• 6M: -7.91%
• YTD: -14.75%
• 1Y: -2.10%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MUU

• 1D: 9.50%
• 1M: -10.60%
• 6M: 441.55%
• YTD: 640.02%
• 1Y: 3,397.63%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QCML vs. MUU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
QCML GraniteShares 2x Long QCOM Daily ETF	-14.75%	-16.71%
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares	640.02%	526.22%

Correlation

The correlation between QCML and MUU is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.33
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2025	0.41

Return for Risk

QCML vs. MUU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QCML

QCML Risk / Return Rank: 13
QCML Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
QCML Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
QCML Omega Ratio Rank: 18
QCML Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
QCML Martin Ratio Rank: 9

MUU

MUU Risk / Return Rank: 99
MUU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
MUU Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
MUU Omega Ratio Rank: 97
MUU Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
MUU Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QCML vs. MUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long QCOM Daily ETF (QCML) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QCML	MUU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.02	29.47	-29.49
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.75	5.90	-5.15
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	1.73	-0.63
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.04	81.19	-81.22
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.07	269.76	-269.83

QCML vs. MUU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QCML Sharpe Ratio is -0.02, which is lower than the MUU Sharpe Ratio of 29.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QCML and MUU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QCML vs. MUU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QCML drawdown since its inception was -59.13%, smaller than the maximum MUU drawdown of -75.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QCML and MUU.

Drawdown Indicators

	QCML	MUU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.13%	-75.07%	+15.94%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-58.72%	-52.72%	-6.00%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-53.76%	-30.27%	-23.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-29.73%	-23.44%	-6.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	30.85%	16.68%	+14.17%

Volatility

QCML vs. MUU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GraniteShares 2x Long QCOM Daily ETF (QCML) is 37.27%, while Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU) has a volatility of 67.96%. This indicates that QCML experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MUU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QCML	MUU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	37.27%	67.96%	-30.69%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	92.00%	115.39%	-23.39%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	103.93%	145.68%	-41.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	100.31%	138.08%	-37.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	100.31%	138.08%	-37.77%

QCML vs. MUU - Expense Ratio Comparison

QCML has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than MUU's 1.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

QCML vs. MUU - Dividend Comparison

QCML has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MUU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares	0.64%	4.27%	0.31%
QCML GraniteShares 2x Long QCOM Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QCML and MUU in my portfolio?

QCML and MUU have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QCML or MUU?

MUU has higher volatility (67.96%) compared to QCML (37.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QCML dropped -59.13% vs MUU's -75.07%.

Which ETF is better, QCML or MUU?

On 1-year performance, MUU leads with 3397.63% vs -2.10% for QCML. On fees, MUU is cheaper at 1.01% per year. On volatility, QCML has been the lower-risk option at 37.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QCML or MUU?

Over the 1-year period, MUU has performed better with a 3397.63% return vs -2.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QCML or MUU?

MUU is cheaper with a 1.01% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for QCML.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QCML or MUU?

MUU has the higher dividend yield at 0.64%, compared with 0.00% for QCML.

What is the main difference between QCML and MUU?

QCML tracks Qualcomm Inc. (QCOM), while MUU tracks Micron Technology, Inc. (200% Daily). They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for QCML and 1.01% for MUU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MUU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (29.47 vs -0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.