PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QCLR vs. SHLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QCLR vs. SHLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF (QCLR) and Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QCLR achieves a 0.25% return, which is significantly higher than SHLD's -6.76% return.


QCLR

1D
0.60%
1M
-1.19%
6M
-1.00%
YTD
0.25%
1Y
6.29%
3Y*
12.71%
5Y*
10Y*

SHLD

1D
-0.41%
1M
-5.34%
6M
-20.90%
YTD
-6.76%
1Y
-0.98%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QCLR vs. SHLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
QCLR
Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF
0.25%11.27%20.27%8.74%
SHLD
Global X Defense Tech ETF
-6.76%74.16%35.03%12.89%

Correlation

The correlation between QCLR and SHLD is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2023

0.32

QCLR vs. SHLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QCLR
SHLD

Technology

58.7%
12.2%

Communication Services

14.3%

-

Consumer Cyclical

11.4%

-

Consumer Defensive

6.4%

-

Healthcare

3.7%

-

Industrials

2.6%
87.8%

Utilities

1.2%

-

Basic Materials

1.0%

-

Energy

0.5%

-

Financial Services

0.2%

-

Real Estate

0.1%

-

Technology

QCLR
58.7%
SHLD
12.2%

Communication Services

QCLR
14.3%
SHLD

-

Consumer Cyclical

QCLR
11.4%
SHLD

-

Consumer Defensive

QCLR
6.4%
SHLD

-

Healthcare

QCLR
3.7%
SHLD

-

Industrials

QCLR
2.6%
SHLD
87.8%

Utilities

QCLR
1.2%
SHLD

-

Basic Materials

QCLR
1.0%
SHLD

-

Energy

QCLR
0.5%
SHLD

-

Financial Services

QCLR
0.2%
SHLD

-

Real Estate

QCLR
0.1%
SHLD

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QCLR vs. SHLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QCLR
QCLR Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
QCLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QCLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
QCLR Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
QCLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
QCLR Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

SHLD
SHLD Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
SHLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHLD Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
SHLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHLD Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QCLR vs. SHLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF (QCLR) and Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QCLRSHLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.01

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.62

-0.04

+0.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.19

-0.10

+2.28

QCLR vs. SHLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QCLR Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is higher than the SHLD Sharpe Ratio of -0.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QCLR and SHLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QCLR vs. SHLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QCLR drawdown since its inception was -21.77%, smaller than the maximum SHLD drawdown of -25.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QCLR and SHLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QCLRSHLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.77%

-25.40%

+3.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.22%

-25.40%

+15.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.02%

-22.57%

+20.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.09%

-3.85%

-2.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.88%

10.09%

-7.21%

Volatility

QCLR vs. SHLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF (QCLR) is 3.21%, while Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD) has a volatility of 8.48%. This indicates that QCLR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SHLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QCLRSHLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.21%

8.48%

-5.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.95%

19.87%

-12.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.95%

25.18%

-15.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.37%

21.56%

-9.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.37%

21.56%

-9.19%

QCLR vs. SHLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

QCLR has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SHLD's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

QCLR vs. SHLD - Dividend Comparison

QCLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.90%, more than SHLD's 0.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
QCLR
Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF
14.90%14.89%8.89%0.47%0.27%1.64%
SHLD
Global X Defense Tech ETF
0.70%0.55%0.53%0.26%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QCLR and SHLD have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SHLD has higher volatility (8.48%) compared to QCLR (3.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QCLR dropped -21.77% vs SHLD's -25.40%.

On 1-year performance, QCLR leads with 6.29% vs -0.98% for SHLD. On fees, SHLD is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, QCLR has been the lower-risk option at 3.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, QCLR has performed better with a 6.29% return vs -0.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SHLD is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QCLR.

QCLR has the higher dividend yield at 14.90%, compared with 0.70% for SHLD.

QCLR is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while SHLD is Aerospace & Defense. QCLR tracks NASDAQ-100 Quarterly Collar 95-110 Index, while SHLD tracks Global X Defense Tech Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for QCLR and 0.50% for SHLD.

QCLR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.64 vs -0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QCLR and SHLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer