QCLR vs. SHLD
QCLR (Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF) and SHLD (Global X Defense Tech ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QCLR is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Quarterly Collar 95-110 Index, while SHLD is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the Global X Defense Tech Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, QCLR returned 11.39% vs 9.71% for SHLD. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QCLR charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for SHLD.
Performance
QCLR vs. SHLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QCLR achieves a 1.40% return, which is significantly higher than SHLD's -2.28% return.
QCLR
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.52%
- YTD
- 1.40%
- 6M
- -0.07%
- 1Y
- 11.39%
- 3Y*
- 13.84%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SHLD
- 1D
- -2.39%
- 1M
- -7.01%
- YTD
- -2.28%
- 6M
- 1.71%
- 1Y
- 9.71%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QCLR vs. SHLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QCLR Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF | 1.40% | 11.27% | 20.27% | 8.34% |
SHLD Global X Defense Tech ETF | -2.28% | 74.16% | 35.03% | 12.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between QCLR and SHLD is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2023 | 0.33 |
QCLR vs. SHLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QCLR
SHLD
Technology
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
QCLR
SHLD
Communication Services
QCLR
SHLD
-
Consumer Cyclical
QCLR
SHLD
-
Consumer Defensive
QCLR
SHLD
-
Healthcare
QCLR
SHLD
-
Industrials
QCLR
SHLD
Utilities
QCLR
SHLD
-
Basic Materials
QCLR
SHLD
-
Energy
QCLR
SHLD
-
Financial Services
QCLR
SHLD
-
Real Estate
QCLR
SHLD
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QCLR vs. SHLD — Risk / Return Rank
QCLR
SHLD
QCLR vs. SHLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF (QCLR) and Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QCLR | SHLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.08 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.12 | 0.49 | +0.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.02 | 1.30 | +2.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QCLR | SHLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.17 | 0.41 | +0.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 2.00 | -1.33 |
Drawdowns
QCLR vs. SHLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QCLR drawdown since its inception was -21.77%, which is greater than SHLD's maximum drawdown of -20.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QCLR and SHLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QCLR | SHLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.77% | -20.10% | -1.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.22% | -20.10% | +9.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.58% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.89% | -18.85% | +17.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.20% | -3.19% | -3.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.84% | 7.51% | -4.67% |
Volatility
QCLR vs. SHLD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF (QCLR) is 0.45%, while Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD) has a volatility of 7.81%. This indicates that QCLR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SHLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QCLR | SHLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.45% | 7.81% | -7.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.24% | 19.35% | -12.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.82% | 24.05% | -14.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.42% | 21.13% | -8.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.42% | 21.13% | -8.71% |
QCLR vs. SHLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
QCLR has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SHLD's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
QCLR vs. SHLD - Dividend Comparison
QCLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.68%, more than SHLD's 0.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QCLR Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF | 14.68% | 14.89% | 8.89% | 0.47% | 0.27% | 1.64% |
SHLD Global X Defense Tech ETF | 0.56% | 0.55% | 0.53% | 0.26% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QCLR and SHLD have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SHLD has higher volatility (7.81%) compared to QCLR (0.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QCLR dropped -21.77% vs SHLD's -20.10%.
On 1-year performance, QCLR leads with 11.39% vs 9.71% for SHLD. On fees, SHLD is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, QCLR has been the lower-risk option at 0.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, QCLR has performed better with a 11.39% return vs 9.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SHLD is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QCLR.
QCLR has the higher dividend yield at 14.68%, compared with 0.56% for SHLD.
QCLR is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while SHLD is Aerospace & Defense. QCLR tracks NASDAQ-100 Quarterly Collar 95-110 Index, while SHLD tracks Global X Defense Tech Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for QCLR and 0.50% for SHLD.
QCLR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.17 vs 0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QCLR and SHLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer