QCLR vs. SHLD
QCLR (Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF) and SHLD (Global X Defense Tech ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QCLR is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Quarterly Collar 95-110 Index, while SHLD is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the Global X Defense Tech Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, QCLR returned 6.29% vs -0.98% for SHLD. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QCLR charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for SHLD.
Performance
QCLR vs. SHLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QCLR achieves a 0.25% return, which is significantly higher than SHLD's -6.76% return.
QCLR
- 1D
- 0.60%
- 1M
- -1.19%
- 6M
- -1.00%
- YTD
- 0.25%
- 1Y
- 6.29%
- 3Y*
- 12.71%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SHLD
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- -5.34%
- 6M
- -20.90%
- YTD
- -6.76%
- 1Y
- -0.98%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QCLR vs. SHLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QCLR Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF | 0.25% | 11.27% | 20.27% | 8.74% |
SHLD Global X Defense Tech ETF | -6.76% | 74.16% | 35.03% | 12.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between QCLR and SHLD is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2023 | 0.32 |
QCLR vs. SHLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QCLR
SHLD
Technology
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
QCLR
SHLD
Communication Services
QCLR
SHLD
-
Consumer Cyclical
QCLR
SHLD
-
Consumer Defensive
QCLR
SHLD
-
Healthcare
QCLR
SHLD
-
Industrials
QCLR
SHLD
Utilities
QCLR
SHLD
-
Basic Materials
QCLR
SHLD
-
Energy
QCLR
SHLD
-
Financial Services
QCLR
SHLD
-
Real Estate
QCLR
SHLD
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QCLR vs. SHLD — Risk / Return Rank
QCLR
SHLD
QCLR vs. SHLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF (QCLR) and Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QCLR | SHLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.01 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.62 | -0.04 | +0.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.19 | -0.10 | +2.28 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QCLR vs. SHLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QCLR drawdown since its inception was -21.77%, smaller than the maximum SHLD drawdown of -25.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QCLR and SHLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QCLR | SHLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.77% | -25.40% | +3.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.22% | -25.40% | +15.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.58% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.02% | -22.57% | +20.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.09% | -3.85% | -2.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.88% | 10.09% | -7.21% |
Volatility
QCLR vs. SHLD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF (QCLR) is 3.21%, while Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD) has a volatility of 8.48%. This indicates that QCLR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SHLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QCLR | SHLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.21% | 8.48% | -5.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.95% | 19.87% | -12.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.95% | 25.18% | -15.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.37% | 21.56% | -9.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.37% | 21.56% | -9.19% |
QCLR vs. SHLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
QCLR has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SHLD's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
QCLR vs. SHLD - Dividend Comparison
QCLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.90%, more than SHLD's 0.70% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QCLR Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF | 14.90% | 14.89% | 8.89% | 0.47% | 0.27% | 1.64% |
SHLD Global X Defense Tech ETF | 0.70% | 0.55% | 0.53% | 0.26% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QCLR and SHLD have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SHLD has higher volatility (8.48%) compared to QCLR (3.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QCLR dropped -21.77% vs SHLD's -25.40%.
On 1-year performance, QCLR leads with 6.29% vs -0.98% for SHLD. On fees, SHLD is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, QCLR has been the lower-risk option at 3.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, QCLR has performed better with a 6.29% return vs -0.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SHLD is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QCLR.
QCLR has the higher dividend yield at 14.90%, compared with 0.70% for SHLD.
QCLR is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while SHLD is Aerospace & Defense. QCLR tracks NASDAQ-100 Quarterly Collar 95-110 Index, while SHLD tracks Global X Defense Tech Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for QCLR and 0.50% for SHLD.
QCLR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.64 vs -0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QCLR and SHLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer