QCLN vs. SAIA
QCLN (First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund) is Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy, while SAIA (Saia, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, QCLN returned 16.43%/yr vs 34.25%/yr for SAIA. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
QCLN vs. SAIA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QCLN achieves a 37.91% return, which is significantly lower than SAIA's 47.88% return. Over the past 10 years, QCLN has underperformed SAIA with an annualized return of 16.43%, while SAIA has yielded a comparatively higher 34.25% annualized return.
QCLN
- 1D
- 1.67%
- 1M
- -2.49%
- YTD
- 37.91%
- 6M
- 35.67%
- 1Y
- 90.42%
- 3Y*
- 6.19%
- 5Y*
- -0.62%
- 10Y*
- 16.43%
SAIA
- 1D
- -0.88%
- 1M
- 5.13%
- YTD
- 47.88%
- 6M
- 39.94%
- 1Y
- 85.14%
- 3Y*
- 15.84%
- 5Y*
- 18.61%
- 10Y*
- 34.25%
QCLN vs. SAIA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QCLN First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund | 37.91% | 31.81% | -18.86% | -10.02% | -30.37% | -3.21% | 184.00% | 42.65% | -12.38% | 32.34% |
SAIA Saia, Inc. | 47.88% | -28.35% | 4.00% | 108.99% | -37.79% | 86.41% | 94.16% | 66.82% | -21.10% | 60.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between QCLN and SAIA is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2007 | 0.45 |
The correlation between QCLN and SAIA shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (1 year) to 0.45 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QCLN vs. SAIA — Risk / Return Rank
QCLN
SAIA
QCLN vs. SAIA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN) and Saia, Inc. (SAIA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QCLN | SAIA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.30 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.51 | 3.46 | +2.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.21 | 9.08 | +9.13 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QCLN vs. SAIA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QCLN drawdown since its inception was -76.18%, smaller than the maximum SAIA drawdown of -80.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QCLN and SAIA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QCLN | SAIA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.18% | -80.35% | +4.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.40% | -24.92% | +8.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -56.08% | -60.94% | +4.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -69.49% | -60.94% | -8.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -71.73% | -60.94% | -10.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.75% | -20.31% | -8.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.42% | -28.96% | -14.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.95% | 9.47% | -4.52% |
Volatility
QCLN vs. SAIA - Volatility Comparison
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN) has a higher volatility of 16.96% compared to Saia, Inc. (SAIA) at 11.47%. This indicates that QCLN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SAIA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QCLN | SAIA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.96% | 11.47% | +5.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.95% | 34.98% | -6.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.71% | 47.97% | -11.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.33% | 51.37% | -13.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.10% | 45.75% | -10.65% |
Dividends
QCLN vs. SAIA - Dividend Comparison
QCLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%, while SAIA has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QCLN First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund | 0.16% | 0.25% | 0.87% | 0.76% | 0.33% | 0.01% | 0.30% | 0.85% | 1.03% | 0.45% | 1.24% | 0.72% |
SAIA Saia, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QCLN and SAIA have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QCLN has higher volatility (16.96%) compared to SAIA (11.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QCLN dropped -76.18% vs SAIA's -80.35%.
QCLN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QCLN and SAIA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer