QCLN vs. BITI

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

QCLN (First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund) and BITI (ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QCLN is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq Clean Edge Green Energy Index, while BITI is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bloomberg Bitcoin Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, QCLN returned -2.01%/yr vs -31.62%/yr for BITI. At a correlation of -0.37, they often move in opposite directions. QCLN charges 0.59%/yr vs 1.03%/yr for BITI.

Performance

QCLN vs. BITI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QCLN achieves a 17.05% return, which is significantly lower than BITI's 24.48% return.

QCLN

• 1D: -4.73%
• 1M: -15.37%
• 6M: 5.79%
• YTD: 17.05%
• 1Y: 49.81%
• 3Y*: -2.01%
• 5Y*: -2.94%
• 10Y*: 13.92%

BITI

• 1D: 1.13%
• 1M: 1.49%
• 6M: 35.86%
• YTD: 24.48%
• 1Y: 64.61%
• 3Y*: -31.62%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QCLN vs. BITI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
QCLN First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund	17.05%	31.81%	-18.86%	-10.02%	-8.08%
BITI ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF	24.48%	-1.76%	-62.60%	-66.17%	3.39%

Correlation

The correlation between QCLN and BITI is -0.44, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.44
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.35
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2022	-0.37

Return for Risk

QCLN vs. BITI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QCLN

QCLN Risk / Return Rank: 46
QCLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
QCLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
QCLN Omega Ratio Rank: 39
QCLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
QCLN Martin Ratio Rank: 54

BITI

BITI Risk / Return Rank: 52
BITI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
BITI Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
BITI Omega Ratio Rank: 46
BITI Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
BITI Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QCLN vs. BITI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QCLN	BITI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.27	1.47	-0.21
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.76	2.04	-0.28
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.25	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.11	2.57	-0.46
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.47	6.38	+1.10

QCLN vs. BITI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QCLN Sharpe Ratio is 1.27, which is comparable to the BITI Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QCLN and BITI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QCLN vs. BITI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QCLN drawdown since its inception was -76.18%, smaller than the maximum BITI drawdown of -92.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QCLN and BITI.

Drawdown Indicators

	QCLN	BITI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-76.18%	-92.16%	+15.98%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-23.78%	-25.28%	+1.50%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-56.08%	-84.63%	+28.55%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-69.49%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-71.73%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-39.53%	-86.41%	+46.88%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-43.37%	-68.40%	+25.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.68%	10.16%	-3.48%

Volatility

QCLN vs. BITI - Volatility Comparison

First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN) has a higher volatility of 16.47% compared to ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI) at 10.76%. This indicates that QCLN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BITI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QCLN	BITI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.47%	10.76%	+5.71%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	32.45%	34.28%	-1.83%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	39.56%	44.15%	-4.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	38.88%	52.24%	-13.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	35.41%	52.24%	-16.83%

QCLN vs. BITI - Expense Ratio Comparison

QCLN has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than BITI's 1.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

QCLN vs. BITI - Dividend Comparison

QCLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%, less than BITI's 15.62% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BITI ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF	15.62%	1.60%	3.91%	3.33%	0.06%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QCLN First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund	0.16%	0.25%	0.87%	0.76%	0.33%	0.01%	0.30%	0.85%	1.03%	0.45%	1.24%	0.72%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QCLN and BITI in my portfolio?

QCLN and BITI have a correlation of -0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QCLN or BITI?

QCLN has higher volatility (16.47%) compared to BITI (10.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QCLN dropped -76.18% vs BITI's -92.16%.

Which ETF is better, QCLN or BITI?

On 3-year performance, QCLN leads with -2.01% vs -31.62% for BITI. On fees, QCLN is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, BITI has been the lower-risk option at 10.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QCLN or BITI?

Over the 3-year period, QCLN has performed better with a -2.01% return vs -31.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QCLN or BITI?

QCLN is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for BITI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QCLN or BITI?

BITI has the higher dividend yield at 15.62%, compared with 0.16% for QCLN.

What is the main difference between QCLN and BITI?

QCLN is categorized as Alternative Energy Equities, while BITI is Cryptocurrency. QCLN tracks Nasdaq Clean Edge Green Energy Index, while BITI tracks Bloomberg Bitcoin Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for QCLN and 1.03% for BITI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BITI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.