QCGLIX vs. EPSYX
QCGLIX (CREF Global Equities Account - R3) and EPSYX (MainStay Epoch Global Equity Yield Fund) are both Global Equities funds. Over the past year, QCGLIX returned 31.37% vs 34.73% for EPSYX. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QCGLIX charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.84%/yr for EPSYX.
Performance
QCGLIX vs. EPSYX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QCGLIX achieves a 13.34% return, which is significantly lower than EPSYX's 19.79% return.
QCGLIX
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- 6.08%
- YTD
- 13.34%
- 6M
- 13.83%
- 1Y
- 31.37%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EPSYX
- 1D
- 1.10%
- 1M
- 7.64%
- YTD
- 19.79%
- 6M
- 20.90%
- 1Y
- 34.73%
- 3Y*
- 22.21%
- 5Y*
- 13.14%
- 10Y*
- 10.46%
QCGLIX vs. EPSYX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
QCGLIX CREF Global Equities Account - R3 | 13.34% | 20.08% | 0.00% |
EPSYX MainStay Epoch Global Equity Yield Fund | 19.79% | 22.09% | -0.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between QCGLIX and EPSYX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2024 | 0.77 |
The correlation between QCGLIX and EPSYX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QCGLIX vs. EPSYX — Risk / Return Rank
QCGLIX
EPSYX
QCGLIX vs. EPSYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CREF Global Equities Account - R3 (QCGLIX) and MainStay Epoch Global Equity Yield Fund (EPSYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QCGLIX | EPSYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.63 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.10 | 4.92 | -1.82 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.83 | 19.49 | -5.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QCGLIX | EPSYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.40 | 3.46 | -1.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.01 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.71 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.56 | 0.54 | +1.03 |
Drawdowns
QCGLIX vs. EPSYX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QCGLIX drawdown since its inception was -18.15%, smaller than the maximum EPSYX drawdown of -48.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QCGLIX and EPSYX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QCGLIX | EPSYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.15% | -48.92% | +30.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.29% | -7.22% | -3.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -12.95% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.92% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.35% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.22% | -6.90% | +4.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.29% | 1.82% | +0.47% |
Volatility
QCGLIX vs. EPSYX - Volatility Comparison
CREF Global Equities Account - R3 (QCGLIX) has a higher volatility of 3.92% compared to MainStay Epoch Global Equity Yield Fund (EPSYX) at 3.46%. This indicates that QCGLIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EPSYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QCGLIX | EPSYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.92% | 3.46% | +0.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.64% | 7.93% | +2.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.30% | 10.28% | +3.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.89% | 13.07% | +2.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.89% | 14.89% | +1.00% |
QCGLIX vs. EPSYX - Expense Ratio Comparison
QCGLIX has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than EPSYX's 0.84% expense ratio.
Dividends
QCGLIX vs. EPSYX - Dividend Comparison
QCGLIX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EPSYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.64%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPSYX MainStay Epoch Global Equity Yield Fund | 6.64% | 8.24% | 10.13% | 2.71% | 2.64% | 2.66% | 2.74% | 6.87% | 9.87% | 2.24% | 3.18% | 9.65% |
QCGLIX CREF Global Equities Account - R3 | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QCGLIX and EPSYX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QCGLIX has higher volatility (3.92%) compared to EPSYX (3.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QCGLIX dropped -18.15% vs EPSYX's -48.92%.
EPSYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.46 vs 2.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QCGLIX and EPSYX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer