PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QCGDX vs. WOOPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QCGDX vs. WOOPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Quantified Common Ground Fund (QCGDX) and JPMorgan SMID Cap Equity Fund (WOOPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with QCGDX having a 10.79% return and WOOPX slightly lower at 10.55%.


QCGDX

1D
0.48%
1M
-0.42%
6M
7.56%
YTD
10.79%
1Y
14.29%
3Y*
8.90%
5Y*
7.32%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
10.04%

WOOPX

1D
1.59%
1M
-0.27%
6M
6.49%
YTD
10.55%
1Y
8.66%
3Y*
7.81%
5Y*
3.36%
10Y*
7.29%
ALL TIME*
9.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

QCGDX vs. WOOPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
QCGDX
Quantified Common Ground Fund
10.79%1.02%9.87%14.74%-12.23%32.19%14.65%0.10%
WOOPX
JPMorgan SMID Cap Equity Fund
10.55%-2.61%11.33%13.31%-18.98%23.19%10.20%-0.05%

Correlation

The correlation between QCGDX and WOOPX is 0.66, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2019

0.76

The correlation between QCGDX and WOOPX shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.77 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QCGDX vs. WOOPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QCGDX
QCGDX Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
QCGDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QCGDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
QCGDX Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
QCGDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
QCGDX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

WOOPX
WOOPX Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
WOOPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WOOPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
WOOPX Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
WOOPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
WOOPX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QCGDX vs. WOOPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Quantified Common Ground Fund (QCGDX) and JPMorgan SMID Cap Equity Fund (WOOPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QCGDXWOOPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.12

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.61

0.87

+0.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.85

2.24

+3.61

QCGDX vs. WOOPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QCGDX Sharpe Ratio is 0.99, which is higher than the WOOPX Sharpe Ratio of 0.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QCGDX and WOOPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QCGDX vs. WOOPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QCGDX drawdown since its inception was -22.37%, smaller than the maximum WOOPX drawdown of -58.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QCGDX and WOOPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QCGDXWOOPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.37%

-58.15%

+35.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.38%

-11.37%

+1.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.10%

-23.37%

+7.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.18%

-24.94%

+4.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.52%

-1.28%

-5.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.09%

-8.18%

+2.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.58%

4.39%

-1.81%

Volatility

QCGDX vs. WOOPX - Volatility Comparison

Quantified Common Ground Fund (QCGDX) has a higher volatility of 6.02% compared to JPMorgan SMID Cap Equity Fund (WOOPX) at 3.88%. This indicates that QCGDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WOOPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QCGDXWOOPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.02%

3.88%

+2.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.27%

11.92%

+1.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.31%

16.21%

-0.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.16%

18.86%

-3.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.72%

20.15%

-3.43%

QCGDX vs. WOOPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QCGDX has a 1.68% expense ratio, which is higher than WOOPX's 0.84% expense ratio.


Dividends

QCGDX vs. WOOPX - Dividend Comparison

QCGDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%, less than WOOPX's 6.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QCGDX
Quantified Common Ground Fund
0.63%0.69%4.42%0.22%0.00%5.44%1.65%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WOOPX
JPMorgan SMID Cap Equity Fund
6.32%6.98%1.62%0.49%12.28%20.40%3.88%11.31%26.09%7.74%0.72%9.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


QCGDX and WOOPX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QCGDX has higher volatility (6.02%) compared to WOOPX (3.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QCGDX dropped -22.37% vs WOOPX's -58.15%.

QCGDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.99 vs 0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QCGDX and WOOPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer