PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QCGDX vs. KMVAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QCGDX vs. KMVAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Quantified Common Ground Fund (QCGDX) and Kirr Marbach Partners Value Fund (KMVAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QCGDX achieves a 13.65% return, which is significantly higher than KMVAX's 12.49% return.


QCGDX

1D
-2.74%
1M
-2.12%
YTD
13.65%
6M
12.63%
1Y
18.78%
3Y*
11.87%
5Y*
8.34%
10Y*

KMVAX

1D
-1.25%
1M
0.18%
YTD
12.49%
6M
10.63%
1Y
17.78%
3Y*
21.56%
5Y*
13.07%
10Y*
11.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QCGDX vs. KMVAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
QCGDX
Quantified Common Ground Fund
13.65%1.02%9.87%14.74%-12.23%32.19%14.65%0.10%
KMVAX
Kirr Marbach Partners Value Fund
12.49%14.44%27.82%20.42%-16.01%28.83%2.96%0.13%

Correlation

The correlation between QCGDX and KMVAX is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2019

0.78

The correlation between QCGDX and KMVAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QCGDX vs. KMVAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QCGDX
QCGDX Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
QCGDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QCGDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
QCGDX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
QCGDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
QCGDX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

KMVAX
KMVAX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
KMVAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KMVAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
KMVAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
KMVAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
KMVAX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QCGDX vs. KMVAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Quantified Common Ground Fund (QCGDX) and Kirr Marbach Partners Value Fund (KMVAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QCGDXKMVAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.21

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.39

1.82

+0.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.62

4.91

+5.71

QCGDX vs. KMVAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QCGDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is comparable to the KMVAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QCGDX and KMVAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QCGDX vs. KMVAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QCGDX drawdown since its inception was -22.37%, smaller than the maximum KMVAX drawdown of -65.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QCGDX and KMVAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QCGDXKMVAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.37%

-65.81%

+43.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.92%

-10.22%

+2.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.10%

-21.26%

+5.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.18%

-24.84%

+4.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.10%

-2.38%

-1.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.10%

-9.97%

+3.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.78%

3.78%

-2.00%

Volatility

QCGDX vs. KMVAX - Volatility Comparison

Quantified Common Ground Fund (QCGDX) has a higher volatility of 7.86% compared to Kirr Marbach Partners Value Fund (KMVAX) at 5.11%. This indicates that QCGDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KMVAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QCGDXKMVAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.86%

5.11%

+2.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.68%

12.12%

-0.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.85%

16.13%

-2.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.03%

18.46%

-3.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.64%

20.11%

-3.47%

QCGDX vs. KMVAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QCGDX has a 1.68% expense ratio, which is higher than KMVAX's 1.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

QCGDX vs. KMVAX - Dividend Comparison

QCGDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, less than KMVAX's 4.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KMVAX
Kirr Marbach Partners Value Fund
4.71%5.30%7.58%3.35%3.57%3.72%1.35%2.11%9.38%6.87%5.64%0.34%
QCGDX
Quantified Common Ground Fund
0.61%0.69%4.42%0.22%0.00%5.44%1.65%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QCGDX and KMVAX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QCGDX has higher volatility (7.86%) compared to KMVAX (5.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QCGDX dropped -22.37% vs KMVAX's -65.81%.

QCGDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QCGDX and KMVAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer