PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QCGDX vs. ATGAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QCGDX vs. ATGAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Quantified Common Ground Fund (QCGDX) and Aquila Opportunity Growth Fund (ATGAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


QCGDX

1D
1.49%
1M
2.01%
YTD
18.04%
6M
18.70%
1Y
23.46%
3Y*
13.65%
5Y*
9.03%
10Y*

ATGAX

1D
1.15%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QCGDX vs. ATGAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between QCGDX and ATGAX is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026

0.50

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QCGDX vs. ATGAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QCGDX
QCGDX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
QCGDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QCGDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
QCGDX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
QCGDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
QCGDX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

ATGAX
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QCGDX vs. ATGAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Quantified Common Ground Fund (QCGDX) and Aquila Opportunity Growth Fund (ATGAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QCGDXATGAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.31

QCGDX vs. ATGAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QCGDXATGAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.97

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.70

58.33

-57.64

Drawdowns

QCGDX vs. ATGAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QCGDX drawdown since its inception was -22.37%, which is greater than ATGAX's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QCGDX and ATGAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QCGDXATGAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.37%

0.00%

-22.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.39%

0.00%

-0.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.13%

0.00%

-6.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.52%

Volatility

QCGDX vs. ATGAX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QCGDXATGAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.73%

9.26%

+2.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.75%

9.26%

+5.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.46%

9.26%

+7.20%

QCGDX vs. ATGAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QCGDX has a 1.68% expense ratio, which is higher than ATGAX's 1.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

QCGDX vs. ATGAX - Dividend Comparison

QCGDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.59%, while ATGAX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
ATGAX
Aquila Opportunity Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QCGDX
Quantified Common Ground Fund
0.59%0.69%4.42%0.22%0.00%5.44%1.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


QCGDX and ATGAX have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QCGDX and ATGAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer