QCFIX vs. QLENX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

QCFIX (AQR CVX Fusion Fund Class I) and QLENX (AQR Long-Short Equity Fund Class N) are both mutual funds - QCFIX is a Systematic Trend fund actively managed by AQR, while QLENX is a Long-Short fund actively managed by AQR. Both are actively managed. Their 0.57 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. QCFIX charges 2.17%/yr vs 1.57%/yr for QLENX.

Performance

QCFIX vs. QLENX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AQR CVX Fusion Fund Class I (QCFIX) and AQR Long-Short Equity Fund Class N (QLENX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QCFIX achieves a 13.24% return, which is significantly higher than QLENX's 0.24% return.

QCFIX

• 1D: 1.78%
• 1M: 0.88%
• 6M: 8.64%
• YTD: 13.24%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

QLENX

• 1D: 2.08%
• 1M: 4.57%
• 6M: 1.48%
• YTD: 0.24%
• 1Y: 15.89%
• 3Y*: 24.27%
• 5Y*: 22.62%
• 10Y*: 11.45%
• ALL TIME*: 12.46%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
QCFIX AQR CVX Fusion Fund Class I	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
QLENX AQR Long-Short Equity Fund Class N	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

QCFIX vs. QLENX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
QCFIX AQR CVX Fusion Fund Class I	13.24%	2.00%
QLENX AQR Long-Short Equity Fund Class N	0.24%	6.15%

Correlation

The correlation between QCFIX and QLENX is 0.57, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2025	0.57

Return for Risk

QCFIX vs. QLENX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QCFIX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

QLENX

QLENX Risk / Return Rank: 75
QLENX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
QLENX Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
QLENX Omega Ratio Rank: 79
QLENX Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
QLENX Martin Ratio Rank: 55

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QCFIX vs. QLENX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR CVX Fusion Fund Class I (QCFIX) and AQR Long-Short Equity Fund Class N (QLENX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QCFIX	QLENX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.90	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.84	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.35	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.55	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	7.15	—

Drawdowns

QCFIX vs. QLENX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QCFIX drawdown since its inception was -7.93%, smaller than the maximum QLENX drawdown of -38.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QCFIX and QLENX.

Drawdown Indicators

	QCFIX	QLENX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-7.93%	-38.50%	+30.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-6.09%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-7.09%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-17.19%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-38.50%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.56%	-0.39%	-4.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.08%	-7.42%	+5.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.16%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	QCFIX	QLENX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.42%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	6.70%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.32%	8.15%	+7.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.32%	10.03%	+5.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.32%	10.60%	+4.72%

QCFIX vs. QLENX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QCFIX has a 2.17% expense ratio, which is higher than QLENX's 1.57% expense ratio.

Dividends

QCFIX vs. QLENX - Dividend Comparison

QCFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.91%, more than QLENX's 1.63% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QCFIX AQR CVX Fusion Fund Class I	6.91%	7.82%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QLENX AQR Long-Short Equity Fund Class N	1.63%	1.64%	7.13%	21.21%	14.09%	0.00%	1.59%	0.00%	6.09%	8.91%	2.87%	4.91%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QCFIX and QLENX in my portfolio?

QCFIX and QLENX have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.