QCELX vs. MUIGX

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

QCELX (AQR Large Cap Multi-Style Fund) and MUIGX (Nationwide BNY Mellon Dynamic U.S. Core Fund) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, QCELX returned 14.92%/yr vs 16.31%/yr for MUIGX. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QCELX charges 0.41%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for MUIGX.

Performance

QCELX vs. MUIGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AQR Large Cap Multi-Style Fund (QCELX) and Nationwide BNY Mellon Dynamic U.S. Core Fund (MUIGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QCELX achieves a 17.84% return, which is significantly higher than MUIGX's 9.87% return. Over the past 10 years, QCELX has underperformed MUIGX with an annualized return of 14.92%, while MUIGX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.31% annualized return.

QCELX

• 1D: -0.46%
• 1M: 1.89%
• 6M: 15.26%
• YTD: 17.84%
• 1Y: 31.65%
• 3Y*: 24.59%
• 5Y*: 15.58%
• 10Y*: 14.92%

MUIGX

• 1D: -0.75%
• 1M: 1.02%
• 6M: 8.01%
• YTD: 9.87%
• 1Y: 20.39%
• 3Y*: 18.77%
• 5Y*: 11.14%
• 10Y*: 16.31%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QCELX vs. MUIGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
QCELX AQR Large Cap Multi-Style Fund	17.84%	23.38%	22.73%	26.30%	-15.73%	27.18%	14.93%	24.33%	-10.96%	22.73%
MUIGX Nationwide BNY Mellon Dynamic U.S. Core Fund	9.87%	17.35%	22.33%	24.28%	-21.86%	30.48%	19.17%	47.45%	-0.65%	27.24%

Correlation

The correlation between QCELX and MUIGX is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.95
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.95
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2014	0.95

The correlation between QCELX and MUIGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

QCELX vs. MUIGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QCELX

QCELX Risk / Return Rank: 90
QCELX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
QCELX Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
QCELX Omega Ratio Rank: 83
QCELX Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
QCELX Martin Ratio Rank: 95

MUIGX

MUIGX Risk / Return Rank: 57
MUIGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
MUIGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
MUIGX Omega Ratio Rank: 53
MUIGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
MUIGX Martin Ratio Rank: 65

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QCELX vs. MUIGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR Large Cap Multi-Style Fund (QCELX) and Nationwide BNY Mellon Dynamic U.S. Core Fund (MUIGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QCELX	MUIGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.44	1.64	+0.79
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.31	2.29	+1.02
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.30	+0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.10	2.30	+1.79
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.32	9.69	+7.63

QCELX vs. MUIGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QCELX Sharpe Ratio is 2.44, which is higher than the MUIGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QCELX and MUIGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QCELX vs. MUIGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QCELX drawdown since its inception was -33.52%, smaller than the maximum MUIGX drawdown of -68.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QCELX and MUIGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	QCELX	MUIGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.52%	-68.10%	+34.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.92%	-8.95%	+1.03%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.38%	-18.02%	-0.36%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.70%	-27.33%	-1.37%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.52%	-32.70%	-0.82%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.46%	-1.45%	+0.99%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.62%	-16.84%	+11.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.87%	2.12%	-0.25%

Volatility

QCELX vs. MUIGX - Volatility Comparison

AQR Large Cap Multi-Style Fund (QCELX) and Nationwide BNY Mellon Dynamic U.S. Core Fund (MUIGX) have volatilities of 4.07% and 3.96%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QCELX	MUIGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.07%	3.96%	+0.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.06%	10.03%	+0.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.34%	12.57%	+0.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.01%	17.08%	+1.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.96%	18.50%	+0.46%

QCELX vs. MUIGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QCELX has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is lower than MUIGX's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

QCELX vs. MUIGX - Dividend Comparison

QCELX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.22%, more than MUIGX's 4.51% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MUIGX Nationwide BNY Mellon Dynamic U.S. Core Fund	4.51%	4.96%	4.60%	1.41%	1.15%	7.64%	2.77%	14.46%	48.57%	10.32%	5.60%	4.96%
QCELX AQR Large Cap Multi-Style Fund	12.22%	14.40%	12.89%	13.67%	11.05%	12.41%	9.94%	5.36%	7.81%	0.99%	1.28%	0.89%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QCELX and MUIGX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, QCELX and MUIGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, QCELX or MUIGX?

QCELX has higher volatility (4.07%) compared to MUIGX (3.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QCELX dropped -33.52% vs MUIGX's -68.10%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QCELX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.