QCELX vs. CGUS

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

QCELX (AQR Large Cap Multi-Style Fund) and CGUS (Capital Group Core Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 3 years, QCELX returned 27.59%/yr vs 22.65%/yr for CGUS. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QCELX charges 0.41%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for CGUS.

Performance

QCELX vs. CGUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AQR Large Cap Multi-Style Fund (QCELX) and Capital Group Core Equity ETF (CGUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QCELX achieves a 18.39% return, which is significantly higher than CGUS's 10.75% return.

QCELX

• 1D: 1.28%
• 1M: 6.86%
• YTD: 18.39%
• 6M: 20.41%
• 1Y: 39.78%
• 3Y*: 27.59%
• 5Y*: 16.14%
• 10Y*: 15.23%

CGUS

• 1D: 0.14%
• 1M: 4.22%
• YTD: 10.75%
• 6M: 11.32%
• 1Y: 27.33%
• 3Y*: 22.65%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QCELX vs. CGUS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
QCELX AQR Large Cap Multi-Style Fund	18.39%	23.38%	22.73%	26.30%	-7.78%
CGUS Capital Group Core Equity ETF	10.75%	16.21%	24.89%	27.72%	-7.94%

Correlation

The correlation between QCELX and CGUS is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2022	0.95

The correlation between QCELX and CGUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

QCELX vs. CGUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QCELX

QCELX Risk / Return Rank: 91
QCELX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
QCELX Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
QCELX Omega Ratio Rank: 84
QCELX Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
QCELX Martin Ratio Rank: 96

CGUS

CGUS Risk / Return Rank: 66
CGUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
CGUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
CGUS Omega Ratio Rank: 67
CGUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
CGUS Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QCELX vs. CGUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR Large Cap Multi-Style Fund (QCELX) and Capital Group Core Equity ETF (CGUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QCELX	CGUS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.18	2.23	+0.95
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.29	3.01	+1.28
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.56	1.41	+0.16
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.09	2.93	+2.16
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	23.43	13.65	+9.78
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QCELX vs. CGUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QCELX Sharpe Ratio is 3.18, which is higher than the CGUS Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QCELX and CGUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QCELX	CGUS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.18	2.23	+0.95
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.86	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.81	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.72	0.99	-0.27

Drawdowns

QCELX vs. CGUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QCELX drawdown since its inception was -33.52%, which is greater than CGUS's maximum drawdown of -21.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QCELX and CGUS.

Drawdown Indicators

	QCELX	CGUS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.52%	-21.86%	-11.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.92%	-9.59%	+1.67%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.38%	-18.06%	-0.32%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.70%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.52%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.66%	-4.65%	-1.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.72%	2.06%	-0.34%

Volatility

QCELX vs. CGUS - Volatility Comparison

AQR Large Cap Multi-Style Fund (QCELX) has a higher volatility of 3.01% compared to Capital Group Core Equity ETF (CGUS) at 2.77%. This indicates that QCELX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CGUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QCELX	CGUS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.01%	2.77%	+0.24%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.33%	9.47%	-0.14%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.77%	12.31%	+0.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.93%	16.38%	+2.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.98%	16.38%	+2.60%

QCELX vs. CGUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

QCELX has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is higher than CGUS's 0.33% expense ratio.

Dividends

QCELX vs. CGUS - Dividend Comparison

QCELX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.16%, more than CGUS's 0.86% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CGUS Capital Group Core Equity ETF	0.86%	0.95%	1.02%	1.22%	1.10%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QCELX AQR Large Cap Multi-Style Fund	12.16%	14.40%	12.89%	13.67%	11.05%	12.41%	9.94%	5.36%	7.81%	0.99%	1.28%	0.89%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QCELX and CGUS in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, QCELX and CGUS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, QCELX or CGUS?

QCELX has higher volatility (3.01%) compared to CGUS (2.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QCELX dropped -33.52% vs CGUS's -21.86%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QCELX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.18 vs 2.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.