PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QCELX vs. ALSMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QCELX vs. ALSMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AQR Large Cap Multi-Style Fund (QCELX) and Archer Multi Cap Fund (ALSMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QCELX achieves a 16.25% return, which is significantly lower than ALSMX's 26.78% return.


QCELX

1D
-0.13%
1M
1.52%
YTD
16.25%
6M
14.66%
1Y
35.11%
3Y*
25.92%
5Y*
15.89%
10Y*
15.41%

ALSMX

1D
1.11%
1M
2.14%
YTD
26.78%
6M
24.82%
1Y
42.31%
3Y*
25.23%
5Y*
13.04%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QCELX vs. ALSMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
QCELX
AQR Large Cap Multi-Style Fund
16.25%23.38%22.73%26.30%-15.73%27.18%14.93%0.17%
ALSMX
Archer Multi Cap Fund
26.78%11.47%21.78%25.14%-20.12%16.58%16.01%0.00%

Correlation

The correlation between QCELX and ALSMX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2019

0.92

The correlation between QCELX and ALSMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QCELX vs. ALSMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QCELX
QCELX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
QCELX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QCELX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
QCELX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
QCELX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
QCELX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

ALSMX
ALSMX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
ALSMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALSMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALSMX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
ALSMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALSMX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QCELX vs. ALSMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR Large Cap Multi-Style Fund (QCELX) and Archer Multi Cap Fund (ALSMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QCELXALSMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.45

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.67

4.65

+0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.39

19.79

+0.60

QCELX vs. ALSMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QCELX Sharpe Ratio is 2.79, which is comparable to the ALSMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QCELX and ALSMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QCELX vs. ALSMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QCELX drawdown since its inception was -33.52%, smaller than the maximum ALSMX drawdown of -97.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QCELX and ALSMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QCELXALSMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.52%

-97.87%

+64.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.92%

-9.42%

+1.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.38%

-97.87%

+79.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.70%

-97.87%

+69.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.81%

-96.39%

+94.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.64%

-28.53%

+22.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.81%

2.21%

-0.40%

Volatility

QCELX vs. ALSMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AQR Large Cap Multi-Style Fund (QCELX) is 4.72%, while Archer Multi Cap Fund (ALSMX) has a volatility of 6.33%. This indicates that QCELX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ALSMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QCELXALSMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.72%

6.33%

-1.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.99%

14.20%

-4.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.28%

16.98%

-3.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.00%

1,292.58%

-1,273.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.01%

1,136.02%

-1,117.01%

QCELX vs. ALSMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QCELX has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is lower than ALSMX's 0.96% expense ratio.


Dividends

QCELX vs. ALSMX - Dividend Comparison

QCELX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.39%, more than ALSMX's 5.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ALSMX
Archer Multi Cap Fund
5.65%7.16%3.62%0.46%7.12%1.62%0.43%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QCELX
AQR Large Cap Multi-Style Fund
12.39%14.40%12.89%13.67%11.05%12.41%9.94%5.36%7.81%0.99%1.28%0.89%

Frequently Asked Questions


QCELX and ALSMX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ALSMX has higher volatility (6.33%) compared to QCELX (4.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QCELX dropped -33.52% vs ALSMX's -97.87%.

QCELX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.79 vs 2.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QCELX and ALSMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer