PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QCE.TO vs. MGRW.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QCE.TO vs. MGRW.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Mackenzie Canadian Large Cap Equity Index ETF (QCE.TO) and Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF (MGRW.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QCE.TO achieves a 14.14% return, which is significantly higher than MGRW.TO's 10.77% return.


QCE.TO

1D
0.28%
1M
1.65%
6M
10.77%
YTD
14.14%
1Y
33.07%
3Y*
23.92%
5Y*
15.45%
10Y*

MGRW.TO

1D
0.38%
1M
1.12%
6M
8.14%
YTD
10.77%
1Y
23.31%
3Y*
18.65%
5Y*
11.39%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QCE.TO vs. MGRW.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
QCE.TO
Mackenzie Canadian Large Cap Equity Index ETF
14.14%29.43%21.54%12.44%-6.08%24.89%11.34%
MGRW.TO
Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF
10.77%18.19%21.41%15.35%-9.30%13.37%7.50%

Correlation

The correlation between QCE.TO and MGRW.TO is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2020

0.46

The correlation between QCE.TO and MGRW.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (all time) to 0.58 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QCE.TO vs. MGRW.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QCE.TO
QCE.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
QCE.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QCE.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
QCE.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
QCE.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
QCE.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

MGRW.TO
MGRW.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
MGRW.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGRW.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGRW.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
MGRW.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGRW.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QCE.TO vs. MGRW.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mackenzie Canadian Large Cap Equity Index ETF (QCE.TO) and Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF (MGRW.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QCE.TOMGRW.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.47

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.41

3.49

+0.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.62

14.04

+4.59

QCE.TO vs. MGRW.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QCE.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.87, which is comparable to the MGRW.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QCE.TO and MGRW.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QCE.TO vs. MGRW.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QCE.TO drawdown since its inception was -35.47%, which is greater than MGRW.TO's maximum drawdown of -17.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QCE.TO and MGRW.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QCE.TOMGRW.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.47%

-17.20%

-18.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.54%

-6.72%

-0.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.48%

-12.17%

-0.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.27%

-17.20%

+0.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.08%

+1.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.68%

-3.32%

-0.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.78%

1.67%

+0.11%

Volatility

QCE.TO vs. MGRW.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Mackenzie Canadian Large Cap Equity Index ETF (QCE.TO) is 2.09%, while Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF (MGRW.TO) has a volatility of 2.41%. This indicates that QCE.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MGRW.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QCE.TOMGRW.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.09%

2.41%

-0.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.88%

8.45%

+0.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.57%

10.23%

+1.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.88%

10.76%

+2.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.79%

10.48%

+5.31%

Dividends

QCE.TO vs. MGRW.TO - Dividend Comparison

QCE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.03%, more than MGRW.TO's 1.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
MGRW.TO
Mackenzie Growth Allocation ETF
1.71%1.84%1.93%2.28%2.44%1.77%0.79%0.00%0.00%
QCE.TO
Mackenzie Canadian Large Cap Equity Index ETF
2.03%2.30%3.01%3.49%3.38%2.57%3.17%3.18%2.78%

Frequently Asked Questions


QCE.TO and MGRW.TO have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QCE.TO is categorized as Canada Equities, while MGRW.TO is Diversified Portfolio.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QCE.TO and MGRW.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer