PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QCAP vs. IQQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QCAP vs. IQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest NASDAQ-100 Conservative Buffer ETF - April (QCAP) and ProShares Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (IQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QCAP achieves a 5.23% return, which is significantly lower than IQQQ's 18.72% return.


QCAP

1D
-0.08%
1M
2.34%
YTD
5.23%
6M
5.92%
1Y
11.06%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IQQQ

1D
-0.30%
1M
9.88%
YTD
18.72%
6M
17.39%
1Y
38.70%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QCAP vs. IQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
QCAP
FT Vest NASDAQ-100 Conservative Buffer ETF - April
5.23%7.13%10.40%
IQQQ
ProShares Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF
18.72%17.11%19.84%

Correlation

The correlation between QCAP and IQQQ is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2024

0.89

The correlation between QCAP and IQQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QCAP vs. IQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QCAP
QCAP Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
QCAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QCAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
QCAP Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
QCAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
QCAP Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

IQQQ
IQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
IQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
IQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
IQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
IQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QCAP vs. IQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest NASDAQ-100 Conservative Buffer ETF - April (QCAP) and ProShares Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (IQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QCAPIQQQDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

4.17

2.53

+1.64

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

7.37

3.27

+4.10

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.99

1.43

+0.56

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

13.50

3.49

+10.00

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

67.84

12.41

+55.43

QCAP vs. IQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QCAP Sharpe Ratio is 4.17, which is higher than the IQQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QCAP and IQQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QCAPIQQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.17

2.53

+1.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.26

1.25

+0.01

Drawdowns

QCAP vs. IQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QCAP drawdown since its inception was -9.17%, smaller than the maximum IQQQ drawdown of -20.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QCAP and IQQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QCAPIQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.17%

-20.41%

+11.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.82%

-11.13%

+10.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.08%

-0.30%

+0.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.52%

-3.64%

+3.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.16%

3.13%

-2.97%

Volatility

QCAP vs. IQQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Vest NASDAQ-100 Conservative Buffer ETF - April (QCAP) is 0.99%, while ProShares Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (IQQQ) has a volatility of 3.99%. This indicates that QCAP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QCAPIQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.99%

3.99%

-3.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.93%

11.54%

-9.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.69%

15.40%

-12.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.73%

18.57%

-9.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.73%

18.57%

-9.84%

QCAP vs. IQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

QCAP has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than IQQQ's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

QCAP vs. IQQQ - Dividend Comparison

QCAP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.42%.


PositionTTM20252024
IQQQ
ProShares Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF
4.42%10.34%7.27%
QCAP
FT Vest NASDAQ-100 Conservative Buffer ETF - April
0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QCAP and IQQQ have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IQQQ has higher volatility (3.99%) compared to QCAP (0.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QCAP dropped -9.17% vs IQQQ's -20.41%.

On 1-year performance, IQQQ leads with 38.70% vs 11.06% for QCAP. On fees, IQQQ is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, QCAP has been the lower-risk option at 0.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IQQQ has performed better with a 38.70% return vs 11.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IQQQ is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for QCAP.

IQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 4.42%, compared with 0.00% for QCAP.

They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for QCAP and 0.55% for IQQQ.

QCAP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.17 vs 2.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QCAP and IQQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer