QCAP vs. IQQQ
QCAP (FT Vest NASDAQ-100 Conservative Buffer ETF - April) and IQQQ (ProShares Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF) are both Nasdaq-100 funds. QCAP is actively managed, while IQQQ is passively managed. Over the past year, QCAP returned 11.06% vs 38.70% for IQQQ. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QCAP charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for IQQQ.
Performance
QCAP vs. IQQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QCAP achieves a 5.23% return, which is significantly lower than IQQQ's 18.72% return.
QCAP
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 2.34%
- YTD
- 5.23%
- 6M
- 5.92%
- 1Y
- 11.06%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IQQQ
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- 9.88%
- YTD
- 18.72%
- 6M
- 17.39%
- 1Y
- 38.70%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QCAP vs. IQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
QCAP FT Vest NASDAQ-100 Conservative Buffer ETF - April | 5.23% | 7.13% | 10.40% |
IQQQ ProShares Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF | 18.72% | 17.11% | 19.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between QCAP and IQQQ is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2024 | 0.89 |
The correlation between QCAP and IQQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QCAP vs. IQQQ — Risk / Return Rank
QCAP
IQQQ
QCAP vs. IQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest NASDAQ-100 Conservative Buffer ETF - April (QCAP) and ProShares Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (IQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QCAP | IQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 4.17 | 2.53 | +1.64 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 7.37 | 3.27 | +4.10 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.99 | 1.43 | +0.56 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 13.50 | 3.49 | +10.00 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 67.84 | 12.41 | +55.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QCAP | IQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.17 | 2.53 | +1.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.26 | 1.25 | +0.01 |
Drawdowns
QCAP vs. IQQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QCAP drawdown since its inception was -9.17%, smaller than the maximum IQQQ drawdown of -20.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QCAP and IQQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QCAP | IQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.17% | -20.41% | +11.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.82% | -11.13% | +10.31% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.08% | -0.30% | +0.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.52% | -3.64% | +3.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.16% | 3.13% | -2.97% |
Volatility
QCAP vs. IQQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FT Vest NASDAQ-100 Conservative Buffer ETF - April (QCAP) is 0.99%, while ProShares Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (IQQQ) has a volatility of 3.99%. This indicates that QCAP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QCAP | IQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.99% | 3.99% | -3.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.93% | 11.54% | -9.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.69% | 15.40% | -12.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.73% | 18.57% | -9.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.73% | 18.57% | -9.84% |
QCAP vs. IQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
QCAP has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than IQQQ's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
QCAP vs. IQQQ - Dividend Comparison
QCAP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.42%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
IQQQ ProShares Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF | 4.42% | 10.34% | 7.27% |
QCAP FT Vest NASDAQ-100 Conservative Buffer ETF - April | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QCAP and IQQQ have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IQQQ has higher volatility (3.99%) compared to QCAP (0.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QCAP dropped -9.17% vs IQQQ's -20.41%.
On 1-year performance, IQQQ leads with 38.70% vs 11.06% for QCAP. On fees, IQQQ is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, QCAP has been the lower-risk option at 0.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IQQQ has performed better with a 38.70% return vs 11.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IQQQ is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for QCAP.
IQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 4.42%, compared with 0.00% for QCAP.
They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for QCAP and 0.55% for IQQQ.
QCAP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.17 vs 2.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QCAP and IQQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer