QCAP vs. IBID
QCAP (FT Vest NASDAQ-100 Conservative Buffer ETF - April) and IBID (iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QCAP is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by FT Vest, while IBID is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2027 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. QCAP is actively managed, while IBID is passively managed. Over the past year, QCAP returned 8.97% vs 3.54% for IBID. Their -0.04 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. QCAP charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for IBID.
Performance
QCAP vs. IBID - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QCAP achieves a 5.41% return, which is significantly higher than IBID's 2.35% return.
QCAP
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- 0.58%
- 6M
- 5.09%
- YTD
- 5.41%
- 1Y
- 8.97%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 10.33%
IBID
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.14%
- 6M
- 1.99%
- YTD
- 2.35%
- 1Y
- 3.54%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 5.34%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $833.66K | $776.63K | $746.99K | |
| $440.76K | $295.21K | $395.38K |
QCAP vs. IBID - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
QCAP FT Vest NASDAQ-100 Conservative Buffer ETF - April | 5.41% | 7.13% | 10.87% |
IBID iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF | 2.35% | 5.66% | 4.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between QCAP and IBID is -0.16, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 22, 2024 | -0.04 |
The correlation between QCAP and IBID shifts across timeframes, from -0.16 (1 year) to -0.04 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QCAP vs. IBID — Risk / Return Rank
QCAP
IBID
QCAP vs. IBID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest NASDAQ-100 Conservative Buffer ETF - April (QCAP) and iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QCAP | IBID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.66 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.49 | 6.46 | -2.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.85 | 22.66 | -3.81 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QCAP vs. IBID - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QCAP drawdown since its inception was -9.17%, which is greater than IBID's maximum drawdown of -1.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QCAP and IBID.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QCAP | IBID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.17% | -1.28% | -7.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.58% | -0.55% | -2.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.01% | -0.14% | +0.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.55% | -0.22% | -0.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.48% | 0.16% | +0.32% |
Volatility
QCAP vs. IBID - Volatility Comparison
FT Vest NASDAQ-100 Conservative Buffer ETF - April (QCAP) has a higher volatility of 2.17% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID) at 0.32%. This indicates that QCAP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QCAP | IBID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.17% | 0.32% | +1.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.96% | 0.92% | +3.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.25% | 1.15% | +3.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.70% | 2.21% | +6.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.70% | 2.21% | +6.49% |
QCAP vs. IBID - Expense Ratio Comparison
QCAP has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than IBID's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
QCAP vs. IBID - Dividend Comparison
QCAP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IBID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.90%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IBID iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF | 4.90% | 4.43% | 4.24% | 0.81% |
QCAP FT Vest NASDAQ-100 Conservative Buffer ETF - April | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QCAP and IBID have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QCAP has higher volatility (2.17%) compared to IBID (0.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QCAP dropped -9.17% vs IBID's -1.28%.
On 1-year performance, QCAP leads with 8.97% vs 3.54% for IBID. On fees, IBID is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBID has been the lower-risk option at 0.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, QCAP has performed better with a 8.97% return vs 3.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBID is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for QCAP.
IBID has the higher dividend yield at 4.90%, compared with 0.00% for QCAP.
QCAP is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while IBID is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for QCAP and 0.10% for IBID.
IBID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.09 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QCAP and IBID
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer