QCAP vs. HEQQ

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

QCAP (FT Vest NASDAQ-100 Conservative Buffer ETF - April) and HEQQ (JPMorgan Nasdaq Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF) are both Nasdaq-100 funds. Over the past year, QCAP returned 9.34% vs 14.98% for HEQQ. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QCAP charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for HEQQ.

Performance

QCAP vs. HEQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest NASDAQ-100 Conservative Buffer ETF - April (QCAP) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HEQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with QCAP having a 3.99% return and HEQQ slightly higher at 4.13%.

QCAP

• 1D: -0.96%
• 1M: -0.56%
• YTD: 3.99%
• 6M: 4.11%
• 1Y: 9.34%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

HEQQ

• 1D: -0.72%
• 1M: 0.10%
• YTD: 4.13%
• 6M: 3.27%
• 1Y: 14.98%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QCAP vs. HEQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
QCAP FT Vest NASDAQ-100 Conservative Buffer ETF - April	3.99%	6.09%
HEQQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF	4.13%	16.96%

Correlation

The correlation between QCAP and HEQQ is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.74
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2025	0.78

The correlation between QCAP and HEQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

QCAP vs. HEQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QCAP

QCAP Risk / Return Rank: 91
QCAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
QCAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
QCAP Omega Ratio Rank: 94
QCAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
QCAP Martin Ratio Rank: 96

HEQQ

HEQQ Risk / Return Rank: 54
HEQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
HEQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
HEQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 61
HEQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
HEQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 49

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QCAP vs. HEQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest NASDAQ-100 Conservative Buffer ETF - April (QCAP) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HEQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QCAP	HEQQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.60	1.79	+0.81
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.76	2.52	+1.23
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.64	1.34	+0.31
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.46	1.97	+2.49
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	32.54	7.67	+24.87

QCAP vs. HEQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QCAP Sharpe Ratio is 2.60, which is higher than the HEQQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QCAP and HEQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QCAP vs. HEQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QCAP drawdown since its inception was -9.17%, which is greater than HEQQ's maximum drawdown of -7.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QCAP and HEQQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	QCAP	HEQQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.17%	-7.64%	-1.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.10%	-7.64%	+5.54%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.26%	-1.06%	-0.20%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.53%	-1.13%	+0.60%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.29%	1.96%	-1.67%

Volatility

QCAP vs. HEQQ - Volatility Comparison

FT Vest NASDAQ-100 Conservative Buffer ETF - April (QCAP) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HEQQ) have volatilities of 2.66% and 2.64%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QCAP	HEQQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.66%	2.64%	+0.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.19%	6.71%	-3.52%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.63%	8.44%	-4.81%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.79%	10.87%	-2.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.79%	10.87%	-2.08%

QCAP vs. HEQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

QCAP has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than HEQQ's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

QCAP vs. HEQQ - Dividend Comparison

QCAP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HEQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.19%.

Position	TTM	2025
HEQQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF	0.19%	0.19%
QCAP FT Vest NASDAQ-100 Conservative Buffer ETF - April	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QCAP and HEQQ in my portfolio?

QCAP and HEQQ have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QCAP or HEQQ?

QCAP has higher volatility (2.66%) compared to HEQQ (2.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QCAP dropped -9.17% vs HEQQ's -7.64%.

Which ETF is better, QCAP or HEQQ?

On 1-year performance, HEQQ leads with 14.98% vs 9.34% for QCAP. On fees, HEQQ is cheaper at 0.50% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QCAP or HEQQ?

Over the 1-year period, HEQQ has performed better with a 14.98% return vs 9.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QCAP or HEQQ?

HEQQ is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for QCAP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QCAP or HEQQ?

HEQQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.19%, compared with 0.00% for QCAP.

What is the main difference between QCAP and HEQQ?

They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for QCAP and 0.50% for HEQQ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QCAP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.