QCAP vs. EOCT

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about FT Vest NASDAQ-100 Conservative Buffer ETF - April (QCAP) and Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - October (EOCT).

QCAP and EOCT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QCAP is an actively managed fund by FT Vest. It was launched on Apr 18, 2024. EOCT is an actively managed fund by Innovator. It was launched on Sep 30, 2021.

Performance

QCAP vs. EOCT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest NASDAQ-100 Conservative Buffer ETF - April (QCAP) and Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - October (EOCT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

QCAP vs. EOCT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
QCAP FT Vest NASDAQ-100 Conservative Buffer ETF - April	1.19%	7.13%	10.40%
EOCT Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - October	0.91%	22.03%	9.40%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QCAP achieves a 1.19% return, which is significantly higher than EOCT's 0.91% return.

QCAP

• 1D: 0.35%
• 1M: 0.46%
• YTD: 1.19%
• 6M: 2.96%
• 1Y: 8.81%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EOCT

• 1D: 1.81%
• 1M: -4.00%
• YTD: 0.91%
• 6M: 2.77%
• 1Y: 19.93%
• 3Y*: 11.33%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QCAP vs. EOCT - Expense Ratio Comparison

QCAP has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than EOCT's 0.89% expense ratio.

QCAP

FT Vest NASDAQ-100 Conservative Buffer ETF - April

EOCT

Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - October

Return for Risk

QCAP vs. EOCT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QCAP

QCAP Risk / Return Rank: 56
QCAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
QCAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
QCAP Omega Ratio Rank: 85
QCAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
QCAP Martin Ratio Rank: 68

EOCT

EOCT Risk / Return Rank: 90
EOCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
EOCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
EOCT Omega Ratio Rank: 90
EOCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
EOCT Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QCAP vs. EOCT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest NASDAQ-100 Conservative Buffer ETF - April (QCAP) and Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - October (EOCT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QCAP	EOCT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.80	1.91	-1.11
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.28	2.67	-1.39
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.39	-0.04
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.10	3.04	-1.95
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.07	12.67	-5.60
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QCAP vs. EOCT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QCAP Sharpe Ratio is 0.80, which is lower than the EOCT Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QCAP and EOCT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QCAP	EOCT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80	1.91	-1.11
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.08	0.49	+0.59

Correlation

The correlation between QCAP and EOCT is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

QCAP vs. EOCT - Dividend Comparison

Neither QCAP nor EOCT has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

QCAP vs. EOCT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QCAP drawdown since its inception was -9.17%, smaller than the maximum EOCT drawdown of -20.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QCAP and EOCT.

Drawdown Indicators

	QCAP	EOCT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.17%	-20.35%	+11.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.13%	-6.57%	-1.56%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-4.23%	+4.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.56%	-5.88%	+5.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.26%	1.58%	-0.32%

Volatility

QCAP vs. EOCT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Vest NASDAQ-100 Conservative Buffer ETF - April (QCAP) is 0.70%, while Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - October (EOCT) has a volatility of 4.79%. This indicates that QCAP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EOCT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QCAP	EOCT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.70%	4.79%	-4.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.62%	6.68%	-5.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.02%	10.48%	+0.54%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.04%	11.41%	-2.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.04%	11.41%	-2.37%