QBUL vs. XLRI
QBUL (TrueShares Quarterly Bull Hedge ETF) and XLRI (State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QBUL is a Options Trading fund actively managed by TrueShares, while XLRI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by State Street. Both are actively managed. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QBUL charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XLRI.
Performance
QBUL vs. XLRI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QBUL achieves a 1.38% return, which is significantly lower than XLRI's 7.28% return.
QBUL
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- -0.05%
- 6M
- 1.07%
- YTD
- 1.38%
- 1Y
- 2.91%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLRI
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- -0.01%
- 6M
- 6.59%
- YTD
- 7.28%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QBUL vs. XLRI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QBUL TrueShares Quarterly Bull Hedge ETF | 1.38% | 1.36% |
XLRI State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 7.28% | -0.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between QBUL and XLRI is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025 | 0.10 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QBUL vs. XLRI — Risk / Return Rank
QBUL
XLRI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
QBUL vs. XLRI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Quarterly Bull Hedge ETF (QBUL) and State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLRI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QBUL | XLRI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.19 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.21 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QBUL vs. XLRI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QBUL drawdown since its inception was -2.45%, smaller than the maximum XLRI drawdown of -7.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QBUL and XLRI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QBUL | XLRI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.45% | -7.12% | +4.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.45% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.39% | -0.51% | -0.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.00% | -1.61% | +0.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.32% | — | — |
Volatility
QBUL vs. XLRI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QBUL | XLRI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.31% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.81% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.91% | 11.21% | -7.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.90% | 11.21% | -7.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.90% | 11.21% | -7.31% |
QBUL vs. XLRI - Expense Ratio Comparison
QBUL has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than XLRI's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
QBUL vs. XLRI - Dividend Comparison
QBUL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.82%, less than XLRI's 13.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
QBUL TrueShares Quarterly Bull Hedge ETF | 8.82% | 8.94% | 1.82% |
XLRI State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 13.67% | 6.85% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QBUL and XLRI have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLRI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLRI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for QBUL.
XLRI has the higher dividend yield at 13.67%, compared with 8.82% for QBUL.
QBUL is categorized as Options Trading, while XLRI is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: TrueShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for QBUL and 0.35% for XLRI.
Find the right allocation for QBUL and XLRI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer