QBUL vs. SEPZ
QBUL (TrueShares Quarterly Bull Hedge ETF) and SEPZ (TrueShares Structured Outcome (September) ETF) are both Options Trading funds from TrueShares. QBUL is actively managed, while SEPZ is passively managed. Over the past year, QBUL returned 6.05% vs 22.26% for SEPZ. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QBUL charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for SEPZ.
Performance
QBUL vs. SEPZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QBUL achieves a 2.81% return, which is significantly lower than SEPZ's 8.94% return.
QBUL
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 1.73%
- YTD
- 2.81%
- 6M
- 2.73%
- 1Y
- 6.05%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SEPZ
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 4.35%
- YTD
- 8.94%
- 6M
- 9.15%
- 1Y
- 22.26%
- 3Y*
- 16.71%
- 5Y*
- 11.86%
- 10Y*
- —
QBUL vs. SEPZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
QBUL TrueShares Quarterly Bull Hedge ETF | 2.81% | 4.87% | 0.58% |
SEPZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (September) ETF | 8.94% | 13.18% | 5.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between QBUL and SEPZ is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2024 | 0.68 |
The correlation between QBUL and SEPZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QBUL vs. SEPZ — Risk / Return Rank
QBUL
SEPZ
QBUL vs. SEPZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Quarterly Bull Hedge ETF (QBUL) and TrueShares Structured Outcome (September) ETF (SEPZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QBUL | SEPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.72 | 2.25 | -0.53 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.53 | 3.19 | -0.66 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.40 | -0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.53 | 3.09 | -0.55 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.02 | 14.02 | -9.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QBUL | SEPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.72 | 2.25 | -0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.97 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.15 | 1.06 | +0.09 |
Drawdowns
QBUL vs. SEPZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QBUL drawdown since its inception was -2.45%, smaller than the maximum SEPZ drawdown of -15.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QBUL and SEPZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QBUL | SEPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.45% | -15.22% | +12.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.45% | -7.30% | +4.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.57% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -15.22% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.17% | +0.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.98% | -2.84% | +1.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.24% | 1.61% | -0.37% |
Volatility
QBUL vs. SEPZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for TrueShares Quarterly Bull Hedge ETF (QBUL) is 1.26%, while TrueShares Structured Outcome (September) ETF (SEPZ) has a volatility of 2.63%. This indicates that QBUL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SEPZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QBUL | SEPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.26% | 2.63% | -1.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.23% | 7.25% | -5.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.53% | 9.94% | -6.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.78% | 12.29% | -8.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.78% | 12.46% | -8.68% |
QBUL vs. SEPZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
QBUL has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than SEPZ's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
QBUL vs. SEPZ - Dividend Comparison
QBUL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.70%, more than SEPZ's 2.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QBUL TrueShares Quarterly Bull Hedge ETF | 8.70% | 8.94% | 1.82% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SEPZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (September) ETF | 2.02% | 2.20% | 3.62% | 3.55% | 0.69% | 0.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QBUL and SEPZ have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SEPZ has higher volatility (2.63%) compared to QBUL (1.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QBUL dropped -2.45% vs SEPZ's -15.22%.
On 1-year performance, SEPZ leads with 22.26% vs 6.05% for QBUL. On fees, QBUL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, QBUL has been the lower-risk option at 1.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SEPZ has performed better with a 22.26% return vs 6.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QBUL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for SEPZ.
QBUL has the higher dividend yield at 8.70%, compared with 2.02% for SEPZ.
Their fees differ too: 0.79% for QBUL and 0.80% for SEPZ.
SEPZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QBUL and SEPZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer