QBTZ vs. SMST

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

QBTZ (Defiance Daily Target 2X Short QBTS ETF) and SMST (Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF) are both Inverse Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 1.29% expense ratio.

Performance

QBTZ vs. SMST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Daily Target 2X Short QBTS ETF (QBTZ) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF (SMST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QBTZ achieves a -86.84% return, which is significantly lower than SMST's -51.70% return.

QBTZ

• 1D: -1.57%
• 1M: -73.34%
• YTD: -86.84%
• 6M: -88.85%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SMST

• 1D: -4.37%
• 1M: 82.90%
• YTD: -51.70%
• 6M: -32.23%
• 1Y: 61.22%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QBTZ vs. SMST - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
QBTZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Short QBTS ETF	-86.84%	-50.03%
SMST Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF	-51.70%	241.30%

Correlation

The correlation between QBTZ and SMST is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2025	0.54

Return for Risk

QBTZ vs. SMST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMST

SMST Risk / Return Rank: 22
SMST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
SMST Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
SMST Omega Ratio Rank: 30
SMST Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
SMST Martin Ratio Rank: 16

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QBTZ vs. SMST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Short QBTS ETF (QBTZ) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF (SMST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QBTZ	SMST	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.44	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.42	-0.53	+0.11

Drawdowns

QBTZ vs. SMST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QBTZ drawdown since its inception was -96.03%, roughly equal to the maximum SMST drawdown of -99.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QBTZ and SMST.

Drawdown Indicators

	QBTZ	SMST	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-96.03%	-99.25%	+3.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-85.39%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-95.42%	-98.10%	+2.68%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-55.88%	-90.68%	+34.80%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	40.97%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	QBTZ	SMST	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	37.55%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	126.04%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	234.44%	140.75%	+93.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	234.44%	166.63%	+67.81%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	234.44%	166.63%	+67.81%

QBTZ vs. SMST - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both QBTZ and SMST have an expense ratio of 1.29%.

Dividends

QBTZ vs. SMST - Dividend Comparison

Neither QBTZ nor SMST has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QBTZ and SMST in my portfolio?

QBTZ and SMST have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, QBTZ or SMST?

Both ETFs have the same 1.29% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, QBTZ or SMST?

QBTZ and SMST have the same expense ratio: 1.29% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QBTZ or SMST?

QBTZ and SMST have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between QBTZ and SMST?

They also come from different issuers: Defiance ETFs and Defiance.