QBTZ vs. SMST
QBTZ (Defiance Daily Target 2X Short QBTS ETF) and SMST (Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF) are both Inverse Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 1.29% expense ratio.
Performance
QBTZ vs. SMST - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QBTZ achieves a -82.79% return, which is significantly lower than SMST's -31.56% return.
QBTZ
- 1D
- 10.29%
- 1M
- 4.01%
- 6M
- -78.88%
- YTD
- -82.79%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMST
- 1D
- -1.67%
- 1M
- 37.17%
- 6M
- -24.18%
- YTD
- -31.56%
- 1Y
- 223.04%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QBTZ vs. SMST - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QBTZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Short QBTS ETF | -82.79% | -47.53% |
SMST Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF | -31.56% | 301.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between QBTZ and SMST is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2025 | 0.54 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QBTZ vs. SMST — Risk / Return Rank
QBTZ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SMST
QBTZ vs. SMST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Short QBTS ETF (QBTZ) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF (SMST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QBTZ | SMST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.29 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.39 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 4.64 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QBTZ vs. SMST - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QBTZ drawdown since its inception was -96.03%, roughly equal to the maximum SMST drawdown of -99.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QBTZ and SMST.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QBTZ | SMST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.03% | -99.25% | +3.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -85.39% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -94.02% | -97.31% | +3.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -60.50% | -90.88% | +30.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 43.98% | — |
Volatility
QBTZ vs. SMST - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QBTZ | SMST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 56.47% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 135.94% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 229.09% | 149.09% | +80.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 229.09% | 167.87% | +61.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 229.09% | 167.87% | +61.22% |
QBTZ vs. SMST - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both QBTZ and SMST have an expense ratio of 1.29%.
Dividends
QBTZ vs. SMST - Dividend Comparison
Neither QBTZ nor SMST has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
QBTZ and SMST have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 1.29% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QBTZ and SMST have the same expense ratio: 1.29% per year.
QBTZ and SMST have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Defiance ETFs and Defiance.
Find the right allocation for QBTZ and SMST
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer