QBTZ vs. SARK
QBTZ (Defiance Daily Target 2X Short QBTS ETF) and SARK (Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF) are both Inverse Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QBTZ charges 1.29%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for SARK.
Performance
QBTZ vs. SARK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QBTZ achieves a -86.84% return, which is significantly lower than SARK's -9.16% return.
QBTZ
- 1D
- -1.57%
- 1M
- -73.34%
- YTD
- -86.84%
- 6M
- -88.85%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SARK
- 1D
- -2.55%
- 1M
- -5.04%
- YTD
- -9.16%
- 6M
- -2.48%
- 1Y
- -35.40%
- 3Y*
- -31.10%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QBTZ vs. SARK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QBTZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Short QBTS ETF | -86.84% | -50.03% |
SARK Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF | -9.16% | 12.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between QBTZ and SARK is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2025 | 0.68 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QBTZ vs. SARK — Risk / Return Rank
QBTZ
SARK
QBTZ vs. SARK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Short QBTS ETF (QBTZ) and Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF (SARK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QBTZ | SARK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -0.99 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.42 | -0.25 | -0.17 |
Drawdowns
QBTZ vs. SARK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QBTZ drawdown since its inception was -96.03%, which is greater than SARK's maximum drawdown of -81.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QBTZ and SARK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QBTZ | SARK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.03% | -81.07% | -14.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -40.75% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -74.42% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -95.42% | -79.95% | -15.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -55.88% | -46.49% | -9.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 30.56% | — |
Volatility
QBTZ vs. SARK - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QBTZ | SARK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 9.19% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 25.16% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 234.44% | 35.98% | +198.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 234.44% | 56.23% | +178.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 234.44% | 56.23% | +178.21% |
QBTZ vs. SARK - Expense Ratio Comparison
QBTZ has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than SARK's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
QBTZ vs. SARK - Dividend Comparison
QBTZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SARK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.10%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QBTZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Short QBTS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SARK Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF | 3.10% | 2.82% | 15.49% | 12.57% | 25.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QBTZ and SARK have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SARK is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SARK is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for QBTZ.
SARK has the higher dividend yield at 3.10%, compared with 0.00% for QBTZ.
They also come from different issuers: Defiance ETFs and AXS. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for QBTZ and 0.75% for SARK.
Find the right allocation for QBTZ and SARK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer