PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QBTZ vs. SARK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QBTZ vs. SARK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Daily Target 2X Short QBTS ETF (QBTZ) and Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF (SARK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QBTZ achieves a -86.84% return, which is significantly lower than SARK's -9.16% return.


QBTZ

1D
-1.57%
1M
-73.34%
YTD
-86.84%
6M
-88.85%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SARK

1D
-2.55%
1M
-5.04%
YTD
-9.16%
6M
-2.48%
1Y
-35.40%
3Y*
-31.10%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QBTZ vs. SARK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
QBTZ
Defiance Daily Target 2X Short QBTS ETF
-86.84%-50.03%
SARK
Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF
-9.16%12.23%

Correlation

The correlation between QBTZ and SARK is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2025

0.68

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QBTZ vs. SARK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QBTZ

SARK
SARK Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
SARK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SARK Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
SARK Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
SARK Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
SARK Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QBTZ vs. SARK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Short QBTS ETF (QBTZ) and Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF (SARK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

QBTZ vs. SARK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QBTZSARKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.99

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.42

-0.25

-0.17

Drawdowns

QBTZ vs. SARK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QBTZ drawdown since its inception was -96.03%, which is greater than SARK's maximum drawdown of -81.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QBTZ and SARK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QBTZSARKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.03%

-81.07%

-14.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-40.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-74.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-95.42%

-79.95%

-15.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-55.88%

-46.49%

-9.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

30.56%

Volatility

QBTZ vs. SARK - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QBTZSARKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

234.44%

35.98%

+198.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

234.44%

56.23%

+178.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

234.44%

56.23%

+178.21%

QBTZ vs. SARK - Expense Ratio Comparison

QBTZ has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than SARK's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

QBTZ vs. SARK - Dividend Comparison

QBTZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SARK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.10%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
QBTZ
Defiance Daily Target 2X Short QBTS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SARK
Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF
3.10%2.82%15.49%12.57%25.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


QBTZ and SARK have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SARK is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SARK is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for QBTZ.

SARK has the higher dividend yield at 3.10%, compared with 0.00% for QBTZ.

They also come from different issuers: Defiance ETFs and AXS. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for QBTZ and 0.75% for SARK.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QBTZ and SARK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer