QBTZ vs. QTUM
QBTZ (Defiance Daily Target 2X Short QBTS ETF) and QTUM (Defiance Quantum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QBTZ is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by Defiance, while QTUM is a Technology Equities fund tracking the BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index. QBTZ is actively managed, while QTUM is passively managed. Their -0.70 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. QBTZ charges 1.29%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for QTUM.
Performance
QBTZ vs. QTUM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QBTZ achieves a -84.61% return, which is significantly lower than QTUM's 29.28% return.
QBTZ
- 1D
- -1.12%
- 1M
- 5.00%
- 6M
- -87.87%
- YTD
- -84.61%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
QTUM
- 1D
- 0.67%
- 1M
- -8.88%
- 6M
- 22.33%
- YTD
- 29.28%
- 1Y
- 57.72%
- 3Y*
- 39.51%
- 5Y*
- 24.56%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 25.62%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $14.48M | $12.89M | $20.27M | |
| $54.21M | $61.13M | $111.15M |
QBTZ vs. QTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QBTZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Short QBTS ETF | -84.61% | -47.53% |
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF | 29.28% | -2.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between QBTZ and QTUM is -0.70, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2025 | -0.70 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QBTZ vs. QTUM — Risk / Return Rank
QBTZ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
QTUM
QBTZ vs. QTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Short QBTS ETF (QBTZ) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QBTZ | QTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.29 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.57 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 9.41 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QBTZ vs. QTUM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QBTZ drawdown since its inception was -96.03%, which is greater than QTUM's maximum drawdown of -38.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QBTZ and QTUM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QBTZ | QTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.03% | -38.45% | -57.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -21.51% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -25.39% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -38.45% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -94.65% | -16.16% | -78.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -62.87% | -8.27% | -54.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.87% | — |
Volatility
QBTZ vs. QTUM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QBTZ | QTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 11.38% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 26.47% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 230.14% | 31.67% | +198.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 230.14% | 27.69% | +202.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 230.14% | 27.69% | +202.45% |
QBTZ vs. QTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison
QBTZ has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than QTUM's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
QBTZ vs. QTUM - Dividend Comparison
QBTZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QTUM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QBTZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Short QBTS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF | 0.83% | 1.01% | 0.61% | 0.81% | 1.46% | 0.48% | 0.42% | 0.61% | 0.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QBTZ and QTUM have a correlation of -0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QTUM is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QTUM is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for QBTZ.
QTUM has the higher dividend yield at 0.83%, compared with 0.00% for QBTZ.
QBTZ is categorized as Inverse Equities, while QTUM is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for QBTZ and 0.40% for QTUM.
Find the right allocation for QBTZ and QTUM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer