QBTS vs. PTF
QBTS (D-Wave Quantum Inc) is a stock, while PTF (Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF) is Momentum fund tracking the DWA Technology Technical Leaders Index. Over the past 3 years, QBTS returned 123.62%/yr vs 39.34%/yr for PTF. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
QBTS vs. PTF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QBTS achieves a -10.63% return, which is significantly lower than PTF's 69.64% return.
QBTS
- 1D
- -1.89%
- 1M
- 9.00%
- YTD
- -10.63%
- 6M
- -10.46%
- 1Y
- 47.17%
- 3Y*
- 123.62%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PTF
- 1D
- 1.49%
- 1M
- 6.00%
- YTD
- 69.64%
- 6M
- 66.68%
- 1Y
- 95.99%
- 3Y*
- 39.34%
- 5Y*
- 21.88%
- 10Y*
- 26.39%
QBTS vs. PTF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QBTS D-Wave Quantum Inc | -10.63% | 211.31% | 854.44% | -38.88% | -83.96% |
PTF Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF | 69.64% | 5.68% | 43.65% | 33.73% | -13.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between QBTS and PTF is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 8, 2022 | 0.40 |
The correlation between QBTS and PTF shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (all time) to 0.58 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QBTS vs. PTF — Risk / Return Rank
QBTS
PTF
QBTS vs. PTF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for D-Wave Quantum Inc (QBTS) and Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF (PTF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QBTS | PTF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.95 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.38 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.67 | 5.36 | -4.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.16 | 20.45 | -19.29 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QBTS vs. PTF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QBTS drawdown since its inception was -96.67%, which is greater than PTF's maximum drawdown of -55.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QBTS and PTF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QBTS | PTF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.67% | -55.38% | -41.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -71.01% | -17.99% | -53.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -79.17% | -36.11% | -43.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -44.88% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -44.88% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -47.81% | -4.47% | -43.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -65.66% | -13.26% | -52.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 40.64% | 4.71% | +35.93% |
Volatility
QBTS vs. PTF - Volatility Comparison
D-Wave Quantum Inc (QBTS) has a higher volatility of 42.66% compared to Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF (PTF) at 16.30%. This indicates that QBTS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PTF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QBTS | PTF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 42.66% | 16.30% | +26.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 76.89% | 31.97% | +44.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 108.46% | 40.36% | +68.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 150.99% | 35.34% | +115.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 150.99% | 33.16% | +117.83% |
Dividends
QBTS vs. PTF - Dividend Comparison
QBTS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PTF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PTF Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF | 0.01% | 0.21% | 0.00% | 0.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.08% | 0.04% | 0.26% |
QBTS D-Wave Quantum Inc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QBTS and PTF have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QBTS has higher volatility (42.66%) compared to PTF (16.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QBTS dropped -96.67% vs PTF's -55.38%.
PTF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QBTS and PTF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer