QBTS vs. IGM
QBTS (D-Wave Quantum Inc) is a stock, while IGM (iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF) is Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P North American Expanded Technology Sector Index. Over the past 3 years, QBTS returned 123.62%/yr vs 35.37%/yr for IGM. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
QBTS vs. IGM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QBTS achieves a -10.63% return, which is significantly lower than IGM's 23.42% return.
QBTS
- 1D
- -1.89%
- 1M
- 9.00%
- YTD
- -10.63%
- 6M
- -10.46%
- 1Y
- 47.17%
- 3Y*
- 123.62%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IGM
- 1D
- 0.69%
- 1M
- 3.04%
- YTD
- 23.42%
- 6M
- 23.24%
- 1Y
- 48.57%
- 3Y*
- 35.37%
- 5Y*
- 20.09%
- 10Y*
- 24.57%
QBTS vs. IGM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QBTS D-Wave Quantum Inc | -10.63% | 211.31% | 854.44% | -38.88% | -83.96% |
IGM iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF | 23.42% | 26.76% | 36.99% | 60.68% | -17.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between QBTS and IGM is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 8, 2022 | 0.35 |
The correlation between QBTS and IGM shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (all time) to 0.50 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QBTS vs. IGM — Risk / Return Rank
QBTS
IGM
QBTS vs. IGM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for D-Wave Quantum Inc (QBTS) and iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QBTS | IGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.37 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.67 | 2.97 | -2.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.16 | 10.06 | -8.90 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QBTS vs. IGM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QBTS drawdown since its inception was -96.67%, which is greater than IGM's maximum drawdown of -65.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QBTS and IGM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QBTS | IGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.67% | -65.59% | -31.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -71.01% | -16.44% | -54.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -79.17% | -26.39% | -52.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -40.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -40.68% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -47.81% | -6.80% | -41.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -65.66% | -15.22% | -50.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 40.64% | 4.84% | +35.80% |
Volatility
QBTS vs. IGM - Volatility Comparison
D-Wave Quantum Inc (QBTS) has a higher volatility of 42.66% compared to iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM) at 10.03%. This indicates that QBTS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IGM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QBTS | IGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 42.66% | 10.03% | +32.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 76.89% | 18.11% | +58.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 108.46% | 21.98% | +86.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 150.99% | 25.91% | +125.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 150.99% | 24.66% | +126.33% |
Dividends
QBTS vs. IGM - Dividend Comparison
QBTS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IGM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGM iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF | 0.13% | 0.17% | 0.22% | 0.33% | 0.66% | 0.16% | 0.32% | 0.50% | 0.57% | 0.57% | 0.90% | 0.79% |
QBTS D-Wave Quantum Inc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QBTS and IGM have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QBTS has higher volatility (42.66%) compared to IGM (10.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QBTS dropped -96.67% vs IGM's -65.59%.
IGM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QBTS and IGM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer