QBSF vs. BAPR
QBSF (AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 ETF) and BAPR (Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April) are both Defined Outcome funds. QBSF is actively managed, while BAPR is passively managed. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QBSF charges 0.64%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for BAPR.
Performance
QBSF vs. BAPR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QBSF achieves a 2.42% return, which is significantly lower than BAPR's 10.98% return.
QBSF
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 0.58%
- YTD
- 2.42%
- 6M
- 3.38%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BAPR
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 2.02%
- YTD
- 10.98%
- 6M
- 11.84%
- 1Y
- 20.29%
- 3Y*
- 15.39%
- 5Y*
- 11.21%
- 10Y*
- —
QBSF vs. BAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QBSF AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 ETF | 2.42% | 4.75% |
BAPR Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April | 10.98% | 6.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between QBSF and BAPR is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2025 | 0.78 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QBSF vs. BAPR — Risk / Return Rank
QBSF
BAPR
QBSF vs. BAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 ETF (QBSF) and Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April (BAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QBSF | BAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 3.62 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.98 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.89 | 0.84 | +2.06 |
Drawdowns
QBSF vs. BAPR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QBSF drawdown since its inception was -1.58%, smaller than the maximum BAPR drawdown of -23.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QBSF and BAPR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QBSF | BAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.58% | -23.91% | +22.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -1.93% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -15.58% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -15.58% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.07% | -0.07% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.22% | -2.59% | +2.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.35% | — |
Volatility
QBSF vs. BAPR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QBSF | BAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.03% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 4.53% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.74% | 5.63% | -2.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.74% | 11.49% | -8.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.74% | 13.12% | -10.38% |
QBSF vs. BAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison
QBSF has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is lower than BAPR's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
QBSF vs. BAPR - Dividend Comparison
Neither QBSF nor BAPR has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
QBSF and BAPR have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QBSF is cheaper at 0.64% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QBSF is cheaper with a 0.64% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for BAPR.
QBSF and BAPR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: AllianzIM and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.64% for QBSF and 0.79% for BAPR.
Find the right allocation for QBSF and BAPR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer