QBF vs. AGZD
QBF (Innovator Uncapped Bitcoin 20 Floor ETF - Quarterly) and AGZD (WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - QBF is a Blockchain fund actively managed by Innovator, while AGZD is a Nontraditional Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond Index, Zero Duration. QBF is actively managed, while AGZD is passively managed. Over the past year, QBF returned -35.86% vs 5.26% for AGZD. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QBF charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.23%/yr for AGZD.
Performance
QBF vs. AGZD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QBF achieves a -23.63% return, which is significantly lower than AGZD's 2.22% return.
QBF
- 1D
- -2.17%
- 1M
- -14.35%
- YTD
- -23.63%
- 6M
- -27.96%
- 1Y
- -35.86%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AGZD
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 0.67%
- YTD
- 2.22%
- 6M
- 2.64%
- 1Y
- 5.26%
- 3Y*
- 6.02%
- 5Y*
- 4.32%
- 10Y*
- 3.15%
QBF vs. AGZD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QBF Innovator Uncapped Bitcoin 20 Floor ETF - Quarterly | -23.63% | -14.22% |
AGZD WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond Fund | 2.22% | 3.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between QBF and AGZD is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 7, 2025 | 0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QBF vs. AGZD — Risk / Return Rank
QBF
AGZD
QBF vs. AGZD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Uncapped Bitcoin 20 Floor ETF - Quarterly (QBF) and WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond Fund (AGZD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QBF | AGZD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.78 | 1.36 | -0.58 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.84 | 6.09 | -6.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.48 | 19.08 | -20.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QBF | AGZD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.37 | 1.83 | -3.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.21 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.85 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.97 | 0.64 | -1.61 |
Drawdowns
QBF vs. AGZD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QBF drawdown since its inception was -42.92%, which is greater than AGZD's maximum drawdown of -8.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QBF and AGZD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QBF | AGZD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.92% | -8.46% | -34.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -42.92% | -0.87% | -42.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -1.71% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -2.23% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -8.46% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -42.92% | -0.39% | -42.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.82% | -0.77% | -16.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.20% | 0.28% | +23.92% |
Volatility
QBF vs. AGZD - Volatility Comparison
Innovator Uncapped Bitcoin 20 Floor ETF - Quarterly (QBF) has a higher volatility of 7.09% compared to WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond Fund (AGZD) at 1.03%. This indicates that QBF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AGZD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QBF | AGZD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.09% | 1.03% | +6.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.56% | 1.99% | +16.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.36% | 2.89% | +23.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.53% | 3.59% | +24.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.53% | 3.72% | +24.81% |
QBF vs. AGZD - Expense Ratio Comparison
QBF has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than AGZD's 0.23% expense ratio.
Dividends
QBF vs. AGZD - Dividend Comparison
QBF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.81%, less than AGZD's 3.99% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGZD WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond Fund | 3.99% | 4.12% | 3.96% | 6.07% | 8.61% | 1.66% | 2.28% | 2.83% | 2.62% | 2.31% | 1.81% | 1.66% |
QBF Innovator Uncapped Bitcoin 20 Floor ETF - Quarterly | 1.81% | 1.38% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QBF and AGZD have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QBF has higher volatility (7.09%) compared to AGZD (1.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QBF dropped -42.92% vs AGZD's -8.46%.
On 1-year performance, AGZD leads with 5.26% vs -35.86% for QBF. On fees, AGZD is cheaper at 0.23% per year. On volatility, AGZD has been the lower-risk option at 1.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, AGZD has performed better with a 5.26% return vs -35.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AGZD is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for QBF.
AGZD has the higher dividend yield at 3.99%, compared with 1.81% for QBF.
QBF is categorized as Blockchain, while AGZD is Nontraditional Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for QBF and 0.23% for AGZD.
AGZD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs -1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QBF and AGZD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer