QBER vs. XLRI
QBER (TrueShares Quarterly Bear Hedge ETF) and XLRI (State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QBER is a Options Trading fund actively managed by TrueShares, while XLRI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by State Street. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.06, they often move in opposite directions. QBER charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XLRI.
Performance
QBER vs. XLRI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QBER achieves a -0.69% return, which is significantly lower than XLRI's 6.95% return.
QBER
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- -0.19%
- 6M
- -0.00%
- YTD
- -0.69%
- 1Y
- -0.42%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLRI
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- -0.31%
- 6M
- 5.66%
- YTD
- 6.95%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QBER vs. XLRI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QBER TrueShares Quarterly Bear Hedge ETF | -0.69% | 0.35% |
XLRI State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 6.95% | -0.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between QBER and XLRI is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025 | -0.06 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QBER vs. XLRI — Risk / Return Rank
QBER
XLRI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
QBER vs. XLRI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Quarterly Bear Hedge ETF (QBER) and State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLRI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QBER | XLRI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.18 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.36 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QBER vs. XLRI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QBER drawdown since its inception was -5.72%, smaller than the maximum XLRI drawdown of -7.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QBER and XLRI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QBER | XLRI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.72% | -7.12% | +1.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.35% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.43% | -0.82% | -4.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.74% | -1.61% | -3.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.16% | — | — |
Volatility
QBER vs. XLRI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QBER | XLRI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.17% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.87% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.80% | 11.20% | -7.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.29% | 11.20% | -4.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.29% | 11.20% | -4.91% |
QBER vs. XLRI - Expense Ratio Comparison
QBER has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than XLRI's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
QBER vs. XLRI - Dividend Comparison
QBER's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.29%, less than XLRI's 13.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
QBER TrueShares Quarterly Bear Hedge ETF | 3.29% | 3.26% | 1.35% |
XLRI State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 13.71% | 6.85% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QBER and XLRI have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLRI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLRI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for QBER.
XLRI has the higher dividend yield at 13.71%, compared with 3.29% for QBER.
QBER is categorized as Options Trading, while XLRI is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: TrueShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for QBER and 0.35% for XLRI.
Find the right allocation for QBER and XLRI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer