PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QBER vs. XLRI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QBER vs. XLRI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TrueShares Quarterly Bear Hedge ETF (QBER) and State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLRI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QBER achieves a -0.35% return, which is significantly lower than XLRI's 6.71% return.


QBER

1D
0.15%
1M
0.40%
YTD
-0.35%
6M
0.28%
1Y
-0.12%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XLRI

1D
1.31%
1M
1.23%
YTD
6.71%
6M
7.39%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QBER vs. XLRI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between QBER and XLRI is -0.10, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025

-0.11

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QBER vs. XLRI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QBER
QBER Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
QBER Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QBER Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
QBER Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
QBER Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
QBER Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

XLRI

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QBER vs. XLRI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Quarterly Bear Hedge ETF (QBER) and State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLRI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QBERXLRIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.12

QBER vs. XLRI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QBER vs. XLRI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QBER drawdown since its inception was -5.72%, smaller than the maximum XLRI drawdown of -7.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QBER and XLRI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QBERXLRIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.72%

-7.12%

+1.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.11%

-0.54%

-4.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.73%

-1.65%

-3.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.06%

Volatility

QBER vs. XLRI - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QBERXLRIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.68%

10.99%

-7.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.33%

10.99%

-4.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.33%

10.99%

-4.66%

QBER vs. XLRI - Expense Ratio Comparison

QBER has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than XLRI's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

QBER vs. XLRI - Dividend Comparison

QBER's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.27%, less than XLRI's 12.24% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


QBER and XLRI have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XLRI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XLRI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for QBER.

XLRI has the higher dividend yield at 12.24%, compared with 3.27% for QBER.

QBER is categorized as Options Trading, while XLRI is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: TrueShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for QBER and 0.35% for XLRI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QBER and XLRI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer