PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QBER vs. FTQI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QBER vs. FTQI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TrueShares Quarterly Bear Hedge ETF (QBER) and First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF (FTQI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QBER achieves a -0.83% return, which is significantly lower than FTQI's 12.31% return.


QBER

1D
-0.31%
1M
0.08%
6M
-0.08%
YTD
-0.83%
1Y
-1.05%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-0.26%

FTQI

1D
0.78%
1M
0.51%
6M
10.29%
YTD
12.31%
1Y
24.78%
3Y*
16.87%
5Y*
12.04%
10Y*
8.22%
ALL TIME*
7.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$11.49M$8.85M$6.01M
$460.54K$316.09K$665.79K

QBER vs. FTQI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
QBER
TrueShares Quarterly Bear Hedge ETF
-0.83%0.25%0.04%
FTQI
First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF
12.31%12.68%8.17%

Correlation

The correlation between QBER and FTQI is -0.55, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2024

-0.52

The correlation between QBER and FTQI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.55 to -0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QBER vs. FTQI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QBER
QBER Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
QBER Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QBER Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
QBER Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
QBER Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
QBER Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

FTQI
FTQI Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
FTQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTQI Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
FTQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTQI Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QBER vs. FTQI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Quarterly Bear Hedge ETF (QBER) and First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF (FTQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QBERFTQIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

1.41

-0.45

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.45

3.99

-4.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.89

17.99

-18.87

QBER vs. FTQI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QBER Sharpe Ratio is -0.27, which is lower than the FTQI Sharpe Ratio of 2.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QBER and FTQI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QBER vs. FTQI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QBER drawdown since its inception was -5.72%, smaller than the maximum FTQI drawdown of -19.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QBER and FTQI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QBERFTQIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.72%

-19.42%

+13.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.35%

-6.24%

+3.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.56%

-1.24%

-4.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.75%

-3.72%

-1.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.22%

1.38%

-0.16%

Volatility

QBER vs. FTQI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for TrueShares Quarterly Bear Hedge ETF (QBER) is 1.14%, while First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF (FTQI) has a volatility of 3.67%. This indicates that QBER experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTQI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QBERFTQIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.14%

3.67%

-2.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.94%

9.09%

-6.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.85%

11.23%

-7.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.24%

14.79%

-8.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.24%

12.93%

-6.69%

QBER vs. FTQI - Expense Ratio Comparison

QBER has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than FTQI's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

QBER vs. FTQI - Dividend Comparison

QBER's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.29%, less than FTQI's 11.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTQI
First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF
11.20%11.46%11.66%11.49%9.85%3.05%3.27%2.95%3.27%2.74%3.02%3.54%
QBER
TrueShares Quarterly Bear Hedge ETF
3.29%3.26%1.35%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QBER and FTQI have a correlation of -0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTQI has higher volatility (3.67%) compared to QBER (1.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QBER dropped -5.72% vs FTQI's -19.42%.

On 1-year performance, FTQI leads with 24.78% vs -1.05% for QBER. On fees, FTQI is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, QBER has been the lower-risk option at 1.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FTQI has performed better with a 24.78% return vs -1.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FTQI is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for QBER.

FTQI has the higher dividend yield at 11.20%, compared with 3.29% for QBER.

QBER is categorized as Options Trading, while FTQI is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: TrueShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for QBER and 0.75% for FTQI.

FTQI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs -0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QBER and FTQI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer