QAT vs. SOXX
QAT (iShares MSCI Qatar ETF) and SOXX (iShares Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QAT is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI All Qatar Capped Index, while SOXX is a Semiconductors fund tracking the NYSE Semiconductor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, QAT returned 4.34%/yr vs 35.56%/yr for SOXX. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QAT charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for SOXX.
Performance
QAT vs. SOXX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QAT achieves a -0.05% return, which is significantly lower than SOXX's 101.03% return. Over the past 10 years, QAT has underperformed SOXX with an annualized return of 4.34%, while SOXX has yielded a comparatively higher 35.56% annualized return.
QAT
- 1D
- -1.37%
- 1M
- 0.05%
- YTD
- -0.05%
- 6M
- 1.39%
- 1Y
- 3.73%
- 3Y*
- 4.09%
- 5Y*
- 3.48%
- 10Y*
- 4.34%
SOXX
- 1D
- 5.79%
- 1M
- 29.90%
- YTD
- 101.03%
- 6M
- 100.20%
- 1Y
- 192.69%
- 3Y*
- 56.47%
- 5Y*
- 34.67%
- 10Y*
- 35.56%
QAT vs. SOXX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QAT iShares MSCI Qatar ETF | -0.05% | 8.81% | 5.20% | 2.72% | -7.23% | 14.42% | 6.94% | -0.44% | 20.03% | -11.66% |
SOXX iShares Semiconductor ETF | 101.03% | 40.74% | 12.92% | 67.12% | -35.09% | 44.09% | 52.72% | 62.42% | -6.49% | 39.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between QAT and SOXX is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2014 | 0.24 |
QAT vs. SOXX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QAT
SOXX
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Real Estate
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Technology
Financial Services
QAT
SOXX
-
Industrials
QAT
SOXX
-
Basic Materials
QAT
SOXX
-
Communication Services
QAT
SOXX
-
Real Estate
QAT
SOXX
-
Energy
QAT
SOXX
-
Utilities
QAT
SOXX
-
Healthcare
QAT
SOXX
-
Consumer Cyclical
QAT
SOXX
-
Consumer Defensive
QAT
SOXX
-
Technology
QAT
SOXX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QAT vs. SOXX — Risk / Return Rank
QAT
SOXX
QAT vs. SOXX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Qatar ETF (QAT) and iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QAT | SOXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.28 | 5.68 | -5.40 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.48 | 5.40 | -4.92 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.75 | -0.69 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.38 | 12.50 | -12.12 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.73 | 47.94 | -47.22 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QAT | SOXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 | 5.68 | -5.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 | 0.97 | -0.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 | 1.07 | -0.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.07 | 0.45 | -0.38 |
Drawdowns
QAT vs. SOXX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QAT drawdown since its inception was -45.21%, smaller than the maximum SOXX drawdown of -70.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QAT and SOXX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QAT | SOXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.21% | -70.21% | +25.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.60% | -15.77% | +5.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.41% | -41.36% | +23.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.17% | -45.75% | +12.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.04% | -45.75% | +11.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.48% | 0.00% | -12.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.18% | -19.97% | +0.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.52% | 4.11% | +1.41% |
Volatility
QAT vs. SOXX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Qatar ETF (QAT) is 5.05%, while iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX) has a volatility of 14.19%. This indicates that QAT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOXX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QAT | SOXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.05% | 14.19% | -9.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.50% | 27.33% | -16.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.36% | 34.17% | -20.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.01% | 36.11% | -21.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.56% | 33.43% | -15.87% |
QAT vs. SOXX - Expense Ratio Comparison
QAT has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than SOXX's 0.34% expense ratio.
Dividends
QAT vs. SOXX - Dividend Comparison
QAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.51%, more than SOXX's 0.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QAT iShares MSCI Qatar ETF | 3.51% | 3.51% | 5.90% | 3.92% | 4.78% | 2.33% | 2.63% | 3.57% | 4.63% | 4.10% | 3.51% | 4.49% |
SOXX iShares Semiconductor ETF | 0.28% | 0.57% | 0.67% | 0.78% | 1.26% | 0.64% | 0.81% | 1.23% | 1.37% | 0.90% | 1.08% | 1.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QAT and SOXX have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SOXX has higher volatility (14.19%) compared to QAT (5.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QAT dropped -45.21% vs SOXX's -70.21%.
On 10-year performance, SOXX leads with 35.56% vs 4.34% for QAT. On fees, SOXX is cheaper at 0.34% per year. On volatility, QAT has been the lower-risk option at 5.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SOXX has performed better with a 35.56% return vs 4.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SOXX is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for QAT.
QAT has the higher dividend yield at 3.51%, compared with 0.28% for SOXX.
QAT is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while SOXX is Semiconductors. QAT tracks MSCI All Qatar Capped Index, while SOXX tracks NYSE Semiconductor Index. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for QAT and 0.34% for SOXX.
SOXX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.68 vs 0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QAT and SOXX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer