QAT vs. SGOV
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI Qatar ETF (QAT) and iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV).
QAT and SGOV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QAT is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI All Qatar Capped Index. It was launched on Apr 29, 2014. SGOV is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the ICE 0-3 Month US Treasury Securities Index. It was launched on May 26, 2020. Both QAT and SGOV are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
QAT vs. SGOV - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
QAT vs. SGOV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QAT iShares MSCI Qatar ETF | -0.84% | 8.81% | 5.20% | 2.72% | -7.23% | 14.42% | 19.06% |
SGOV iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF | 0.88% | 4.24% | 5.27% | 5.12% | 1.58% | 0.04% | 0.05% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QAT achieves a -0.84% return, which is significantly lower than SGOV's 0.88% return.
QAT
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- -1.11%
- YTD
- -0.84%
- 6M
- -2.60%
- 1Y
- 8.20%
- 3Y*
- 5.57%
- 5Y*
- 3.66%
- 10Y*
- 3.25%
SGOV
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- YTD
- 0.88%
- 6M
- 1.89%
- 1Y
- 4.07%
- 3Y*
- 4.80%
- 5Y*
- 3.41%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
QAT vs. SGOV - Expense Ratio Comparison
QAT has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than SGOV's 0.09% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
QAT vs. SGOV — Risk / Return Rank
QAT
SGOV
QAT vs. SGOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Qatar ETF (QAT) and iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QAT | SGOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.62 | 20.61 | -19.99 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.87 | 283.87 | -283.00 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 201.33 | -200.20 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.80 | 411.31 | -410.51 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.75 | 4,618.08 | -4,616.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QAT | SGOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 | 20.61 | -19.99 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 | 14.12 | -13.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.18 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.07 | 12.34 | -12.28 |
Correlation
The correlation between QAT and SGOV is -0.04. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
QAT vs. SGOV - Dividend Comparison
QAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.54%, less than SGOV's 3.95% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QAT iShares MSCI Qatar ETF | 3.54% | 3.51% | 5.90% | 3.92% | 4.78% | 2.33% | 2.63% | 3.57% | 4.63% | 4.10% | 3.51% | 4.49% |
SGOV iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF | 3.95% | 4.10% | 5.10% | 4.87% | 1.45% | 0.03% | 0.05% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
QAT vs. SGOV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QAT drawdown since its inception was -45.21%, which is greater than SGOV's maximum drawdown of -0.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QAT and SGOV.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| QAT | SGOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.21% | -0.03% | -45.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.60% | -0.01% | -10.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.17% | -0.03% | -33.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.04% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.17% | 0.00% | -13.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.28% | 0.00% | -19.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.84% | 0.00% | +4.84% |
Volatility
QAT vs. SGOV - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Qatar ETF (QAT) has a higher volatility of 5.00% compared to iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV) at 0.06%. This indicates that QAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SGOV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| QAT | SGOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.00% | 0.06% | +4.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.06% | 0.13% | +8.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.22% | 0.20% | +13.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.83% | 0.24% | +14.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.60% | 0.24% | +17.36% |