PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QAT vs. FEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

QAT vs. FEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Qatar ETF (QAT) and First Trust Emerging Markets AlphaDEX Fund (FEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

QAT vs. FEM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QAT
iShares MSCI Qatar ETF
-1.16%8.81%5.20%2.72%-7.23%14.42%6.94%-0.44%20.03%-11.66%
FEM
First Trust Emerging Markets AlphaDEX Fund
9.64%28.36%3.01%10.84%-14.24%7.40%-1.68%20.55%-15.51%41.05%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QAT achieves a -1.16% return, which is significantly lower than FEM's 9.64% return. Over the past 10 years, QAT has underperformed FEM with an annualized return of 3.21%, while FEM has yielded a comparatively higher 8.47% annualized return.


QAT

1D
2.22%
1M
-4.42%
YTD
-1.16%
6M
-3.61%
1Y
8.10%
3Y*
5.46%
5Y*
3.59%
10Y*
3.21%

FEM

1D
1.40%
1M
-4.37%
YTD
9.64%
6M
11.51%
1Y
35.39%
3Y*
16.74%
5Y*
6.92%
10Y*
8.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QAT vs. FEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

QAT has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than FEM's 0.80% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

QAT vs. FEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QAT
QAT Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
QAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
QAT Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
QAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
QAT Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

FEM
FEM Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
FEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEM Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
FEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEM Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QAT vs. FEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Qatar ETF (QAT) and First Trust Emerging Markets AlphaDEX Fund (FEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QATFEMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.62

1.85

-1.23

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.86

2.34

-1.48

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.36

-0.23

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.82

2.66

-1.84

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.80

12.54

-10.74

QAT vs. FEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QAT Sharpe Ratio is 0.62, which is lower than the FEM Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QAT and FEM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QATFEMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

1.85

-1.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

0.38

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

0.41

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.07

0.16

-0.10

Correlation

The correlation between QAT and FEM is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

QAT vs. FEM - Dividend Comparison

QAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.55%, more than FEM's 2.84% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QAT
iShares MSCI Qatar ETF
3.55%3.51%5.90%3.92%4.78%2.33%2.63%3.57%4.63%4.10%3.51%4.49%
FEM
First Trust Emerging Markets AlphaDEX Fund
2.84%3.13%3.66%4.96%6.15%4.15%2.68%3.31%3.52%2.45%2.25%3.61%

Drawdowns

QAT vs. FEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QAT drawdown since its inception was -45.21%, roughly equal to the maximum FEM drawdown of -46.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QAT and FEM.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


QATFEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.21%

-46.23%

+1.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.60%

-13.19%

+2.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.17%

-31.72%

-1.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.04%

-46.23%

+12.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.45%

-5.40%

-8.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.29%

-15.20%

-4.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.81%

2.79%

+2.02%

Volatility

QAT vs. FEM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Qatar ETF (QAT) is 5.05%, while First Trust Emerging Markets AlphaDEX Fund (FEM) has a volatility of 8.51%. This indicates that QAT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


QATFEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.05%

8.51%

-3.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.07%

13.64%

-4.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.22%

19.24%

-6.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.84%

18.21%

-3.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.60%

20.95%

-3.35%