QAT vs. EWX
QAT (iShares MSCI Qatar ETF) and EWX (SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Small Cap ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - QAT tracks the MSCI All Qatar Capped Index while EWX tracks the S&P Emerging Markets Under USD2 Billion Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, QAT returned 4.34%/yr vs 9.86%/yr for EWX. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QAT charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for EWX.
Performance
QAT vs. EWX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QAT achieves a -0.05% return, which is significantly lower than EWX's 15.28% return. Over the past 10 years, QAT has underperformed EWX with an annualized return of 4.34%, while EWX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.86% annualized return.
QAT
- 1D
- -1.37%
- 1M
- 0.05%
- YTD
- -0.05%
- 6M
- 1.39%
- 1Y
- 3.73%
- 3Y*
- 4.09%
- 5Y*
- 3.48%
- 10Y*
- 4.34%
EWX
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 3.32%
- YTD
- 15.28%
- 6M
- 17.57%
- 1Y
- 30.50%
- 3Y*
- 16.53%
- 5Y*
- 7.53%
- 10Y*
- 9.86%
QAT vs. EWX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QAT iShares MSCI Qatar ETF | -0.05% | 8.81% | 5.20% | 2.72% | -7.23% | 14.42% | 6.94% | -0.44% | 20.03% | -11.66% |
EWX SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Small Cap ETF | 15.28% | 15.46% | 6.81% | 18.13% | -15.00% | 18.15% | 14.84% | 15.59% | -18.75% | 34.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between QAT and EWX is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2014 | 0.33 |
QAT vs. EWX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QAT
EWX
Financial Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Real Estate
Energy
Utilities
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Technology
Financial Services
QAT
EWX
Industrials
QAT
EWX
Basic Materials
QAT
EWX
Communication Services
QAT
EWX
Real Estate
QAT
EWX
Energy
QAT
EWX
Utilities
QAT
EWX
Healthcare
QAT
EWX
Consumer Cyclical
QAT
EWX
Consumer Defensive
QAT
EWX
Technology
QAT
EWX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QAT vs. EWX — Risk / Return Rank
QAT
EWX
QAT vs. EWX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Qatar ETF (QAT) and SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Small Cap ETF (EWX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QAT | EWX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.28 | 2.07 | -1.79 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.48 | 2.82 | -2.34 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.38 | -0.31 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.38 | 3.91 | -3.53 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.73 | 12.39 | -11.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QAT | EWX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 | 2.07 | -1.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 | 0.50 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 | 0.58 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.07 | 0.22 | -0.15 |
Drawdowns
QAT vs. EWX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QAT drawdown since its inception was -45.21%, smaller than the maximum EWX drawdown of -63.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QAT and EWX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QAT | EWX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.21% | -63.90% | +18.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.60% | -7.98% | -2.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.41% | -21.37% | +3.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.17% | -24.67% | -8.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.04% | -43.00% | +8.96% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.48% | -0.21% | -12.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.18% | -13.17% | -6.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.52% | 2.52% | +3.00% |
Volatility
QAT vs. EWX - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Qatar ETF (QAT) and SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Small Cap ETF (EWX) have volatilities of 5.05% and 5.11%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QAT | EWX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.05% | 5.11% | -0.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.50% | 12.20% | -1.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.36% | 14.79% | -1.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.01% | 15.19% | -0.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.56% | 17.14% | +0.42% |
QAT vs. EWX - Expense Ratio Comparison
QAT has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than EWX's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
QAT vs. EWX - Dividend Comparison
QAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.51%, more than EWX's 2.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWX SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Small Cap ETF | 2.52% | 2.91% | 2.90% | 2.32% | 3.00% | 2.77% | 2.24% | 2.73% | 3.26% | 2.30% | 2.46% | 3.04% |
QAT iShares MSCI Qatar ETF | 3.51% | 3.51% | 5.90% | 3.92% | 4.78% | 2.33% | 2.63% | 3.57% | 4.63% | 4.10% | 3.51% | 4.49% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QAT and EWX have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EWX has higher volatility (5.11%) compared to QAT (5.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QAT dropped -45.21% vs EWX's -63.90%.
On 10-year performance, EWX leads with 9.86% vs 4.34% for QAT. On fees, QAT is cheaper at 0.59% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EWX has performed better with a 9.86% return vs 4.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QAT is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for EWX.
QAT has the higher dividend yield at 3.51%, compared with 2.52% for EWX.
QAT tracks MSCI All Qatar Capped Index, while EWX tracks S&P Emerging Markets Under USD2 Billion Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for QAT and 0.65% for EWX.
EWX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QAT and EWX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer