QARP vs. EQLT
QARP (Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF) and EQLT (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Quality Factor ETF) are both Quality Factor funds - QARP tracks the Russell 1000 2Qual/Val 5% Capped Factor Index while EQLT tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Quality Factor Select Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, QARP returned 25.79% vs 44.38% for EQLT. Their 0.53 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. QARP charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for EQLT.
Performance
QARP vs. EQLT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QARP achieves a 13.09% return, which is significantly lower than EQLT's 22.86% return.
QARP
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- 1.69%
- 6M
- 8.81%
- YTD
- 13.09%
- 1Y
- 25.79%
- 3Y*
- 16.68%
- 5Y*
- 11.83%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 14.16%
EQLT
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- -1.35%
- 6M
- 14.71%
- YTD
- 22.86%
- 1Y
- 44.38%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 29.13%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $77.09K | $55.23K | $122.39K | |
| $110.48K | $118.49K | $177.11K |
QARP vs. EQLT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
QARP Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF | 13.09% | 13.99% | 4.81% |
EQLT iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Quality Factor ETF | 22.86% | 33.93% | -1.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between QARP and EQLT is 0.60, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 6, 2024 | 0.53 |
The correlation between QARP and EQLT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.
QARP vs. EQLT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QARP
EQLT
Technology
Healthcare
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
QARP
EQLT
Healthcare
QARP
EQLT
Financial Services
QARP
EQLT
Communication Services
QARP
EQLT
Consumer Defensive
QARP
EQLT
Consumer Cyclical
QARP
EQLT
Industrials
QARP
EQLT
Energy
QARP
EQLT
Basic Materials
QARP
EQLT
Utilities
QARP
EQLT
Real Estate
QARP
EQLT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QARP vs. EQLT — Risk / Return Rank
QARP
EQLT
QARP vs. EQLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Quality Factor ETF (EQLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QARP | EQLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.33 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.37 | 3.61 | -0.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.08 | 10.91 | +4.17 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QARP vs. EQLT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QARP drawdown since its inception was -35.44%, which is greater than EQLT's maximum drawdown of -17.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QARP and EQLT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QARP | EQLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.44% | -17.38% | -18.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.26% | -12.00% | +4.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.65% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.75% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.14% | -8.36% | +8.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.37% | -3.81% | -0.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.62% | 3.96% | -2.34% |
Volatility
QARP vs. EQLT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP) is 2.59%, while iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Quality Factor ETF (EQLT) has a volatility of 5.98%. This indicates that QARP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EQLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QARP | EQLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.59% | 5.98% | -3.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.16% | 21.15% | -12.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.71% | 23.39% | -12.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.52% | 21.25% | -5.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.51% | 21.25% | -1.74% |
QARP vs. EQLT - Expense Ratio Comparison
QARP has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than EQLT's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
QARP vs. EQLT - Dividend Comparison
QARP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, less than EQLT's 2.85% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EQLT iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Quality Factor ETF | 2.85% | 3.10% | 0.51% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QARP Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF | 1.02% | 1.14% | 1.39% | 1.28% | 1.68% | 1.34% | 1.61% | 1.85% | 1.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QARP and EQLT have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EQLT has higher volatility (5.98%) compared to QARP (2.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QARP dropped -35.44% vs EQLT's -17.38%.
On 1-year performance, EQLT leads with 44.38% vs 25.79% for QARP. On fees, QARP is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, QARP has been the lower-risk option at 2.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, EQLT has performed better with a 44.38% return vs 25.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QARP is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for EQLT.
EQLT has the higher dividend yield at 2.85%, compared with 1.02% for QARP.
QARP tracks Russell 1000 2Qual/Val 5% Capped Factor Index, while EQLT tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Quality Factor Select Index. They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for QARP and 0.35% for EQLT.
QARP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QARP and EQLT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer