QALTX vs. QCGDX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

QALTX (Quantified Alternative Investment Fund) and QCGDX (Quantified Common Ground Fund) are both mutual funds - QALTX is a Macro Trading fund managed by Advisors Preferred, while QCGDX is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Advisors Preferred. Over the past 5 years, QALTX returned 4.15%/yr vs 9.08%/yr for QCGDX. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QALTX charges 1.33%/yr vs 1.68%/yr for QCGDX.

Performance

QALTX vs. QCGDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Quantified Alternative Investment Fund (QALTX) and Quantified Common Ground Fund (QCGDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QALTX achieves a 5.90% return, which is significantly lower than QCGDX's 16.84% return.

QALTX

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: -1.82%
• YTD: 5.90%
• 6M: 5.03%
• 1Y: 18.32%
• 3Y*: 8.88%
• 5Y*: 4.15%
• 10Y*: 4.58%

QCGDX

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: 0.63%
• YTD: 16.84%
• 6M: 16.10%
• 1Y: 22.20%
• 3Y*: 12.91%
• 5Y*: 9.08%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QALTX vs. QCGDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
QALTX Quantified Alternative Investment Fund	5.90%	14.31%	4.11%	2.76%	-8.13%	11.76%	1.01%	0.10%
QCGDX Quantified Common Ground Fund	16.84%	1.02%	9.87%	14.74%	-12.23%	32.19%	14.65%	0.10%

Correlation

The correlation between QALTX and QCGDX is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.64
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.73
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.73
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2019	0.75

The correlation between QALTX and QCGDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.75 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

QALTX vs. QCGDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QALTX

QALTX Risk / Return Rank: 67
QALTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
QALTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
QALTX Omega Ratio Rank: 62
QALTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
QALTX Martin Ratio Rank: 81

QCGDX

QCGDX Risk / Return Rank: 53
QCGDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
QCGDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
QCGDX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
QCGDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
QCGDX Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QALTX vs. QCGDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Quantified Alternative Investment Fund (QALTX) and Quantified Common Ground Fund (QCGDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QALTX	QCGDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.06	1.73	+0.33
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.68	2.41	+0.26
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.33	+0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.84	2.96	+0.89
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.02	13.27	+0.75

QALTX vs. QCGDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QALTX Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is comparable to the QCGDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QALTX and QCGDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QALTX vs. QCGDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QALTX drawdown since its inception was -24.22%, which is greater than QCGDX's maximum drawdown of -22.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QALTX and QCGDX.

Drawdown Indicators

	QALTX	QCGDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.22%	-22.37%	-1.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.99%	-7.92%	+2.93%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.47%	-16.10%	+4.63%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-13.17%	-20.18%	+7.01%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-24.22%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.06%	-1.40%	-1.66%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.05%	-6.10%	+0.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.36%	1.76%	-0.40%

Volatility

QALTX vs. QCGDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Quantified Alternative Investment Fund (QALTX) is 3.54%, while Quantified Common Ground Fund (QCGDX) has a volatility of 7.34%. This indicates that QALTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QCGDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QALTX	QCGDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.54%	7.34%	-3.80%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.51%	11.31%	-4.80%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.34%	13.58%	-4.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.91%	14.98%	-6.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.93%	16.61%	-6.68%

QALTX vs. QCGDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QALTX has a 1.33% expense ratio, which is lower than QCGDX's 1.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

QALTX vs. QCGDX - Dividend Comparison

QALTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.29%, more than QCGDX's 0.59% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QALTX Quantified Alternative Investment Fund	2.29%	2.42%	1.61%	3.55%	1.73%	12.79%	0.00%	1.44%	0.07%	3.12%	0.04%	0.84%
QCGDX Quantified Common Ground Fund	0.59%	0.69%	4.42%	0.22%	0.00%	5.44%	1.65%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QALTX and QCGDX in my portfolio?

QALTX and QCGDX have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QALTX or QCGDX?

QCGDX has higher volatility (7.34%) compared to QALTX (3.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QALTX dropped -24.22% vs QCGDX's -22.37%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QALTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.