PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QALT vs. IBIE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QALT vs. IBIE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SEI DBi Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF (QALT) and iShares iBonds Oct 2028 Term TIPS ETF (IBIE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QALT achieves a 7.15% return, which is significantly higher than IBIE's 1.90% return.


QALT

1D
0.14%
1M
0.83%
6M
4.68%
YTD
7.15%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

IBIE

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.29%
6M
1.31%
YTD
1.90%
1Y
3.03%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
5.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$698.05K$699.21K$764.03K
$670.75K$485.66K$308.26K

QALT vs. IBIE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between QALT and IBIE is -0.05, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2025

-0.05

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QALT vs. IBIE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QALT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


IBIE
IBIE Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
IBIE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIE Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIE Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QALT vs. IBIE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI DBi Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF (QALT) and iShares iBonds Oct 2028 Term TIPS ETF (IBIE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QALTIBIEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.03

QALT vs. IBIE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QALT vs. IBIE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QALT drawdown since its inception was -4.85%, which is greater than IBIE's maximum drawdown of -1.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QALT and IBIE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QALTIBIEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.85%

-1.70%

-3.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.62%

-0.20%

-0.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.22%

-0.38%

-0.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.23%

Volatility

QALT vs. IBIE - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QALTIBIEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

48.83%

1.54%

+47.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

48.83%

2.80%

+46.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

48.83%

2.80%

+46.03%

QALT vs. IBIE - Expense Ratio Comparison

QALT has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIE's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

QALT vs. IBIE - Dividend Comparison

QALT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.02%, more than IBIE's 4.96% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
IBIE
iShares iBonds Oct 2028 Term TIPS ETF
4.96%4.09%4.23%0.75%
QALT
SEI DBi Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF
6.02%5.15%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QALT and IBIE have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IBIE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IBIE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for QALT.

QALT has the higher dividend yield at 6.02%, compared with 4.96% for IBIE.

QALT is categorized as Multistrategy, while IBIE is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: SEI and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for QALT and 0.10% for IBIE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QALT and IBIE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer