QALGX vs. QQQX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

QALGX (Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth Fund Class A) and QQQX (Nuveen NASDAQ 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. QALGX is actively managed, while QQQX is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, QALGX returned 19.93%/yr vs 13.33%/yr for QQQX. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QALGX charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.92%/yr for QQQX.

Performance

QALGX vs. QQQX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth Fund Class A (QALGX) and Nuveen NASDAQ 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund (QQQX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QALGX achieves a 8.32% return, which is significantly lower than QQQX's 11.14% return. Over the past 10 years, QALGX has outperformed QQQX with an annualized return of 19.93%, while QQQX has yielded a comparatively lower 13.33% annualized return.

QALGX

• 1D: -0.92%
• 1M: 5.42%
• YTD: 8.32%
• 6M: 9.53%
• 1Y: 25.41%
• 3Y*: 27.99%
• 5Y*: 18.27%
• 10Y*: 19.93%

QQQX

• 1D: -0.61%
• 1M: 2.18%
• YTD: 11.14%
• 6M: 14.21%
• 1Y: 32.80%
• 3Y*: 15.49%
• 5Y*: 9.44%
• 10Y*: 13.33%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QALGX vs. QQQX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
QALGX Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth Fund Class A	8.32%	19.14%	40.93%	39.32%	-25.07%	30.14%	38.00%	31.73%	1.24%	25.16%
QQQX Nuveen NASDAQ 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund	11.14%	14.87%	25.61%	21.68%	-27.39%	25.32%	15.75%	28.83%	-11.68%	39.19%

Correlation

The correlation between QALGX and QQQX is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.29
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.53
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.66
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.69
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2007	0.70

Over the past year, the correlation between QALGX and QQQX has dropped to 0.29 - well below their long-term average of 0.70, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

QALGX vs. QQQX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QALGX

QALGX Risk / Return Rank: 31
QALGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
QALGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
QALGX Omega Ratio Rank: 41
QALGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
QALGX Martin Ratio Rank: 22

QQQX

QQQX Risk / Return Rank: 68
QQQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
QQQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
QQQX Omega Ratio Rank: 57
QQQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
QQQX Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QALGX vs. QQQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth Fund Class A (QALGX) and Nuveen NASDAQ 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund (QQQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QALGX	QQQX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.64	2.24	-0.60
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.31	3.25	-0.94
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.42	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.68	3.61	-1.94
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.31	16.87	-11.57
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QALGX vs. QQQX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QALGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is comparable to the QQQX Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QALGX and QQQX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QALGX	QQQX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.64	2.24	-0.60
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.87	0.48	+0.39
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.94	0.63	+0.30
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.59	0.48	+0.11

Drawdowns

QALGX vs. QQQX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QALGX drawdown since its inception was -53.63%, smaller than the maximum QQQX drawdown of -57.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QALGX and QQQX.

Drawdown Indicators

	QALGX	QQQX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.63%	-57.25%	+3.62%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.86%	-9.11%	-6.75%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.02%	-22.80%	-2.22%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.12%	-29.33%	-0.79%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-31.73%	-35.96%	+4.23%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.21%	-2.36%	+1.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.16%	-8.02%	-1.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.00%	1.95%	+3.05%

Volatility

QALGX vs. QQQX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth Fund Class A (QALGX) is 3.40%, while Nuveen NASDAQ 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund (QQQX) has a volatility of 4.31%. This indicates that QALGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QALGX	QQQX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.40%	4.31%	-0.91%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.24%	11.58%	+1.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.22%	14.71%	+1.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.14%	19.82%	+1.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.34%	21.06%	+0.28%

QALGX vs. QQQX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QALGX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQX's 0.92% expense ratio.

Dividends

QALGX vs. QQQX - Dividend Comparison

QALGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.16%, less than QQQX's 7.40% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QALGX Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth Fund Class A	3.16%	3.42%	7.26%	1.59%	14.79%	20.92%	7.92%	5.33%	10.82%	7.70%	0.57%	12.13%
QQQX Nuveen NASDAQ 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund	7.40%	7.85%	6.73%	7.26%	9.66%	5.85%	6.00%	6.49%	8.40%	5.95%	7.54%	7.23%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QALGX and QQQX in my portfolio?

QALGX and QQQX have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QALGX or QQQX?

QQQX has higher volatility (4.31%) compared to QALGX (3.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QALGX dropped -53.63% vs QQQX's -57.25%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QQQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.