QAITX vs. HGER

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Q3 All-Weather Tactical Fund (QAITX) and Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF (HGER).

QAITX is managed by Q3 Asset Management Corporation. It was launched on Dec 29, 2019. HGER is a passively managed fund by Harbor that tracks the performance of the Quantix Commodity Index - Benchmark TR Net. It was launched on Feb 9, 2022.

Performance

QAITX vs. HGER - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Q3 All-Weather Tactical Fund (QAITX) and Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF (HGER). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

QAITX vs. HGER - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
QAITX Q3 All-Weather Tactical Fund	-7.35%	3.53%	16.11%	23.71%	-31.52%
HGER Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF	25.22%	20.08%	9.25%	1.93%	9.77%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QAITX achieves a -7.35% return, which is significantly lower than HGER's 25.22% return.

QAITX

• 1D: 2.88%
• 1M: -5.80%
• YTD: -7.35%
• 6M: -6.58%
• 1Y: 3.58%
• 3Y*: 9.37%
• 5Y*: -0.36%
• 10Y*: —

HGER

• 1D: 0.23%
• 1M: 6.26%
• YTD: 25.22%
• 6M: 29.21%
• 1Y: 37.94%
• 3Y*: 18.53%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QAITX vs. HGER - Expense Ratio Comparison

QAITX has a 1.36% expense ratio, which is higher than HGER's 0.68% expense ratio.

QAITX

Q3 All-Weather Tactical Fund

HGER

Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF

Return for Risk

QAITX vs. HGER — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QAITX

QAITX Risk / Return Rank: 10
QAITX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
QAITX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
QAITX Omega Ratio Rank: 8
QAITX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
QAITX Martin Ratio Rank: 12

HGER

HGER Risk / Return Rank: 93
HGER Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
HGER Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
HGER Omega Ratio Rank: 90
HGER Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
HGER Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QAITX vs. HGER - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Q3 All-Weather Tactical Fund (QAITX) and Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF (HGER). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QAITX	HGER	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.30	2.11	-1.81
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.49	2.78	-2.29
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.06	1.39	-0.33
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.34	4.35	-4.00
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.31	15.38	-14.07
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QAITX vs. HGER - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QAITX Sharpe Ratio is 0.30, which is lower than the HGER Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QAITX and HGER, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QAITX	HGER	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.30	2.11	-1.81
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.03	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.26	0.90	-0.63

Correlation

The correlation between QAITX and HGER is 0.07, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

QAITX vs. HGER - Dividend Comparison

QAITX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, less than HGER's 5.66% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
QAITX Q3 All-Weather Tactical Fund	1.00%	1.85%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	7.77%	7.57%
HGER Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF	5.66%	7.09%	3.28%	7.24%	0.64%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

QAITX vs. HGER - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QAITX drawdown since its inception was -40.35%, which is greater than HGER's maximum drawdown of -23.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QAITX and HGER.

Drawdown Indicators

	QAITX	HGER	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.35%	-23.31%	-17.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.49%	-8.84%	-4.65%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-40.35%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-16.13%	-0.38%	-15.75%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.90%	-7.90%	-8.00%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.53%	2.50%	+1.03%

Volatility

QAITX vs. HGER - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Q3 All-Weather Tactical Fund (QAITX) is 6.27%, while Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF (HGER) has a volatility of 7.23%. This indicates that QAITX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HGER based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QAITX	HGER	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.27%	7.23%	-0.96%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.61%	14.60%	-1.99%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.06%	18.06%	-4.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.45%	17.78%	-4.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.67%	17.78%	-3.11%