QABA vs. TRUF
QABA (First Trust NASDAQ ABA Community Bank Index Fund) and TRUF (VanEck Financials TruSector ETF) are both Financials Equities funds. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QABA charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for TRUF.
Performance
QABA vs. TRUF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
QABA
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- 2.92%
- 6M
- 17.86%
- YTD
- 20.23%
- 1Y
- 21.46%
- 3Y*
- 21.02%
- 5Y*
- 7.40%
- 10Y*
- 7.83%
TRUF
- 1D
- 0.61%
- 1M
- 5.40%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QABA vs. TRUF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
QABA First Trust NASDAQ ABA Community Bank Index Fund | 15.04% |
TRUF VanEck Financials TruSector ETF | 14.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between QABA and TRUF is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2026 | 0.52 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QABA vs. TRUF — Risk / Return Rank
QABA
TRUF
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
QABA vs. TRUF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust NASDAQ ABA Community Bank Index Fund (QABA) and VanEck Financials TruSector ETF (TRUF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QABA | TRUF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.73 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.30 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QABA vs. TRUF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QABA drawdown since its inception was -49.30%, which is greater than TRUF's maximum drawdown of -3.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QABA and TRUF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QABA | TRUF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.30% | -3.24% | -46.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.49% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.82% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.93% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.30% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.80% | -0.15% | -1.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.37% | -1.12% | -10.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.00% | — | — |
Volatility
QABA vs. TRUF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QABA | TRUF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.45% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.54% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.25% | 13.94% | +8.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.30% | 13.94% | +12.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.58% | 13.94% | +14.64% |
QABA vs. TRUF - Expense Ratio Comparison
QABA has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than TRUF's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
QABA vs. TRUF - Dividend Comparison
QABA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.27%, more than TRUF's 0.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QABA First Trust NASDAQ ABA Community Bank Index Fund | 2.27% | 2.52% | 2.37% | 2.71% | 2.10% | 1.68% | 2.55% | 1.95% | 1.90% | 1.42% | 1.13% | 1.39% |
TRUF VanEck Financials TruSector ETF | 0.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QABA and TRUF have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TRUF is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TRUF is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QABA.
QABA has the higher dividend yield at 2.27%, compared with 0.36% for TRUF.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for QABA and 0.10% for TRUF.
Find the right allocation for QABA and TRUF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer