QABA vs. CAOS
QABA (First Trust NASDAQ ABA Community Bank Index Fund) and CAOS (Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QABA is a Financials Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ OMX ABA Community Bank Index, while CAOS is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Alpha Architect. QABA is passively managed, while CAOS is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, QABA returned 17.94%/yr vs 3.48%/yr for CAOS. Their 0.01 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. QABA charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.63%/yr for CAOS.
Performance
QABA vs. CAOS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QABA achieves a 23.18% return, which is significantly higher than CAOS's 0.76% return.
QABA
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 2.02%
- 6M
- 16.07%
- YTD
- 23.18%
- 1Y
- 33.48%
- 3Y*
- 17.94%
- 5Y*
- 8.03%
- 10Y*
- 8.38%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.66%
CAOS
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- -0.01%
- 6M
- 0.16%
- YTD
- 0.76%
- 1Y
- 1.73%
- 3Y*
- 3.48%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 4.70%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $6.81M | $5.39M | $5.09M | |
| $803.45K | $564.12K | $491.36K |
QABA vs. CAOS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QABA First Trust NASDAQ ABA Community Bank Index Fund | 23.18% | 4.62% | 14.49% | -3.14% |
CAOS Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF | 0.76% | 2.55% | 5.33% | 7.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between QABA and CAOS is -0.24, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2023 | 0.01 |
The correlation between QABA and CAOS shifts across timeframes, from -0.24 (1 year) to 0.01 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QABA vs. CAOS — Risk / Return Rank
QABA
CAOS
QABA vs. CAOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust NASDAQ ABA Community Bank Index Fund (QABA) and Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QABA | CAOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.24 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.48 | 2.47 | +0.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.49 | 5.45 | +1.04 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QABA vs. CAOS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QABA drawdown since its inception was -49.30%, which is greater than CAOS's maximum drawdown of -3.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QABA and CAOS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QABA | CAOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.30% | -3.89% | -45.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.49% | -0.76% | -11.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.82% | -3.60% | -22.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.93% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.30% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.28% | -1.13% | -0.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.33% | -0.92% | -10.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.76% | 0.34% | +4.42% |
Volatility
QABA vs. CAOS - Volatility Comparison
First Trust NASDAQ ABA Community Bank Index Fund (QABA) has a higher volatility of 5.34% compared to Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS) at 0.51%. This indicates that QABA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CAOS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QABA | CAOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.34% | 0.51% | +4.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.48% | 1.07% | +13.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.01% | 1.57% | +20.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.22% | 4.18% | +22.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.59% | 4.18% | +24.41% |
QABA vs. CAOS - Expense Ratio Comparison
QABA has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than CAOS's 0.63% expense ratio.
Dividends
QABA vs. CAOS - Dividend Comparison
QABA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.22%, while CAOS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAOS Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QABA First Trust NASDAQ ABA Community Bank Index Fund | 2.22% | 2.52% | 2.37% | 2.71% | 2.10% | 1.68% | 2.55% | 1.95% | 1.90% | 1.42% | 1.13% | 1.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QABA and CAOS have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QABA has higher volatility (5.34%) compared to CAOS (0.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QABA dropped -49.30% vs CAOS's -3.89%.
On 3-year performance, QABA leads with 17.94% vs 3.48% for CAOS. On fees, QABA is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, CAOS has been the lower-risk option at 0.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, QABA has performed better with a 17.94% return vs 3.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QABA is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for CAOS.
QABA has the higher dividend yield at 2.22%, compared with 0.00% for CAOS.
QABA is categorized as Financials Equities, while CAOS is Options Trading. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Alpha Architect. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for QABA and 0.63% for CAOS.
QABA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QABA and CAOS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer