PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
PZW.TO vs. XMY.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

PZW.TO vs. XMY.TO

Last updated Jul 1, 2026
See Documentation

PZW.TO (Invesco FTSE RAFI Global Small-Mid ETF) and XMY.TO (iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)) are both Global Equities funds - PZW.TO tracks the 50% FTSE RAFI Developed ex US Mid-Small 1500 Index / 50% FTSE RAFI US 1500 Mid-Small Index while XMY.TO tracks the Morningstar Gbl GR CAD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PZW.TO returned 11.60%/yr vs 7.18%/yr for XMY.TO. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

PZW.TO vs. XMY.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Invesco FTSE RAFI Global Small-Mid ETF (PZW.TO) and iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XMY.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PZW.TO achieves a 17.33% return, which is significantly higher than XMY.TO's 2.01% return. Over the past 10 years, PZW.TO has outperformed XMY.TO with an annualized return of 11.60%, while XMY.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 7.18% annualized return.

PZW.TO

1D
0.29%
1M
3.40%
YTD
17.33%
6M
16.85%
1Y
32.19%
3Y*
20.71%
5Y*
10.71%
10Y*
11.60%

XMY.TO

1D
0.06%
1M
-0.08%
YTD
2.01%
6M
0.61%
1Y
4.45%
3Y*
9.36%
5Y*
6.00%
10Y*
7.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PZW.TO vs. XMY.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PZW.TO
Invesco FTSE RAFI Global Small-Mid ETF		17.33%18.48%16.03%12.88%-10.53%17.53%7.48%18.01%-8.08%13.64%
XMY.TO
iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)		2.01%9.22%13.48%7.15%-7.59%16.37%-1.31%19.41%-2.11%15.60%

Correlation

The correlation between PZW.TO and XMY.TO is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2016

0.25

The correlation between PZW.TO and XMY.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (1 year) to 0.31 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PZW.TO vs. XMY.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
PZW.TO
XMY.TO

Industrials

19.2%
8.1%

Financial Services

13.3%
13.2%

Healthcare

12.7%
13.0%

Technology

12.2%
25.8%

Consumer Cyclical

12.1%
5.1%

Real Estate

8.8%
0.6%

Basic Materials

7.0%
1.5%

Consumer Defensive

4.6%
9.8%

Energy

4.1%
3.7%

Communication Services

3.8%
11.9%

Utilities

2.3%
7.3%

Industrials

PZW.TO
19.2%
XMY.TO
8.1%

Financial Services

PZW.TO
13.3%
XMY.TO
13.2%

Healthcare

PZW.TO
12.7%
XMY.TO
13.0%

Technology

PZW.TO
12.2%
XMY.TO
25.8%

Consumer Cyclical

PZW.TO
12.1%
XMY.TO
5.1%

Real Estate

PZW.TO
8.8%
XMY.TO
0.6%

Basic Materials

PZW.TO
7.0%
XMY.TO
1.5%

Consumer Defensive

PZW.TO
4.6%
XMY.TO
9.8%

Energy

PZW.TO
4.1%
XMY.TO
3.7%

Communication Services

PZW.TO
3.8%
XMY.TO
11.9%

Utilities

PZW.TO
2.3%
XMY.TO
7.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Invesco FTSE RAFI Global Small-Mid ETF

iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)

Often compared with PZW.TO:
PZW.TO vs. INAI.TOPZW.TO vs. PXC.TOPZW.TO vs. EQL.TOPZW.TO vs. QQC.TOPZW.TO vs. TEQT.TOPZW.TO vs. QQC-F.TOPZW.TO vs. QQCE.TO
Often compared with XMY.TO:
XMY.TO vs. XMU.TOXMY.TO vs. XMV.TOXMY.TO vs. XML.TOXMY.TO vs. CAGE.TOXMY.TO vs. FCIN.NEOXMY.TO vs. XEQT.TOXMY.TO vs. VMO.TO

Return for Risk

PZW.TO vs. XMY.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
PZW.TO
PZW.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
PZW.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PZW.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
PZW.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
PZW.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
PZW.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
XMY.TO
XMY.TO Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
XMY.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMY.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMY.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
XMY.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMY.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PZW.TO vs. XMY.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE RAFI Global Small-Mid ETF (PZW.TO) and iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XMY.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

PZW.TOXMY.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.28
0.44

+1.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.35
0.67

+2.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.10

+0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.79

0.66

+3.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.53

2.19

+11.34

PZW.TO vs. XMY.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PZW.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is higher than the XMY.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PZW.TO and XMY.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PZW.TO vs. XMY.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PZW.TO drawdown since its inception was -32.45%, which is greater than XMY.TO's maximum drawdown of -29.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PZW.TO and XMY.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

PZW.TOXMY.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.45%

-29.00%

-3.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.50%

-6.74%

-1.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.88%

-8.10%

-8.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.13%

-13.89%

-8.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.45%

-29.00%

-3.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.48%

+2.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.72%

-3.28%

-2.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.38%

2.04%

+0.34%

Volatility

PZW.TO vs. XMY.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco FTSE RAFI Global Small-Mid ETF (PZW.TO) is 2.90%, while iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XMY.TO) has a volatility of 7.23%. This indicates that PZW.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XMY.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

PZW.TOXMY.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.90%

7.23%

-4.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.41%

9.00%

+1.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.17%

10.12%

+4.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.65%

10.17%

+4.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.90%

11.61%

+4.29%

Dividends

PZW.TO vs. XMY.TO - Dividend Comparison

PZW.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.65%, less than XMY.TO's 1.75% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PZW.TO
Invesco FTSE RAFI Global Small-Mid ETF		1.65%1.97%2.12%3.23%1.90%1.93%1.52%2.26%1.78%1.57%1.09%0.96%
XMY.TO
iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)		1.75%1.90%1.91%1.90%1.71%1.40%1.37%2.16%1.45%1.57%2.07%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

PZW.TO and XMY.TO have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PZW.TO tracks 50% FTSE RAFI Developed ex US Mid-Small 1500 Index / 50% FTSE RAFI US 1500 Mid-Small Index, while XMY.TO tracks Morningstar Gbl GR CAD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PZW.TO and XMY.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer