PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PZVSX vs. RYPNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PZVSX vs. RYPNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pzena Small Cap Value Fund (PZVSX) and Royce Opportunity Fund (RYPNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PZVSX achieves a 15.03% return, which is significantly lower than RYPNX's 29.63% return.


PZVSX

1D
0.61%
1M
3.77%
YTD
15.03%
6M
12.84%
1Y
22.29%
3Y*
11.22%
5Y*
5.17%
10Y*

RYPNX

1D
1.78%
1M
6.69%
YTD
29.63%
6M
29.57%
1Y
56.22%
3Y*
21.62%
5Y*
9.47%
10Y*
14.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PZVSX vs. RYPNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PZVSX
Pzena Small Cap Value Fund
15.03%-4.94%1.62%25.62%-5.33%27.93%-0.09%24.84%-15.19%2.10%
RYPNX
Royce Opportunity Fund
29.63%11.95%10.20%19.72%-17.19%30.34%26.52%28.24%-20.10%20.56%

Correlation

The correlation between PZVSX and RYPNX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017

0.90

The correlation between PZVSX and RYPNX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PZVSX vs. RYPNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PZVSX
PZVSX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
PZVSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PZVSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
PZVSX Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
PZVSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
PZVSX Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

RYPNX
RYPNX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
RYPNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYPNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYPNX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
RYPNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYPNX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PZVSX vs. RYPNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pzena Small Cap Value Fund (PZVSX) and Royce Opportunity Fund (RYPNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PZVSXRYPNXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.14

2.81

-1.67

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.78

3.66

-1.88

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.45

-0.25

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.66

5.01

-3.35

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.13

19.11

-14.99

PZVSX vs. RYPNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PZVSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.14, which is lower than the RYPNX Sharpe Ratio of 2.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PZVSX and RYPNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PZVSXRYPNXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.14

2.81

-1.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

0.39

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.54

-0.29

Drawdowns

PZVSX vs. RYPNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PZVSX drawdown since its inception was -54.22%, smaller than the maximum RYPNX drawdown of -69.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PZVSX and RYPNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PZVSXRYPNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.22%

-69.31%

+15.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.26%

-12.01%

-3.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.43%

-30.23%

-2.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.43%

-30.77%

-1.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.75%

0.00%

-0.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.50%

-10.67%

+0.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.13%

3.14%

+2.99%

Volatility

PZVSX vs. RYPNX - Volatility Comparison

Pzena Small Cap Value Fund (PZVSX) has a higher volatility of 6.58% compared to Royce Opportunity Fund (RYPNX) at 5.46%. This indicates that PZVSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RYPNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PZVSXRYPNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.58%

5.46%

+1.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.59%

14.68%

-0.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.24%

21.41%

+0.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.31%

24.26%

+0.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.48%

25.34%

+2.14%

PZVSX vs. RYPNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PZVSX has a 1.52% expense ratio, which is higher than RYPNX's 1.21% expense ratio.


Dividends

PZVSX vs. RYPNX - Dividend Comparison

PZVSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.03%, less than RYPNX's 7.43% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PZVSX
Pzena Small Cap Value Fund
2.03%2.33%7.03%0.45%17.31%1.25%1.39%0.00%4.56%7.54%0.00%0.00%
RYPNX
Royce Opportunity Fund
7.43%9.63%7.95%4.52%5.12%22.51%0.00%1.57%10.21%14.91%6.89%10.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


PZVSX and RYPNX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PZVSX has higher volatility (6.58%) compared to RYPNX (5.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PZVSX dropped -54.22% vs RYPNX's -69.31%.

RYPNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.81 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PZVSX and RYPNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer