PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PZVMX vs. PZIEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PZVMX vs. PZIEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pzena Mid Cap Value Fund (PZVMX) and Pzena Emerging Markets Value Fund Institutional Class (PZIEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PZVMX achieves a 20.55% return, which is significantly higher than PZIEX's 11.34% return. Over the past 10 years, PZVMX has underperformed PZIEX with an annualized return of 10.04%, while PZIEX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.00% annualized return.


PZVMX

1D
-0.57%
1M
4.80%
6M
17.11%
YTD
20.55%
1Y
25.42%
3Y*
8.78%
5Y*
7.79%
10Y*
10.04%
ALL TIME*
8.78%

PZIEX

1D
0.35%
1M
2.58%
6M
-1.10%
YTD
11.34%
1Y
28.39%
3Y*
16.01%
5Y*
11.78%
10Y*
11.00%
ALL TIME*
9.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

PZVMX vs. PZIEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PZVMX
Pzena Mid Cap Value Fund
20.55%-1.16%0.62%21.03%-5.95%30.68%6.30%29.04%-21.54%14.36%
PZIEX
Pzena Emerging Markets Value Fund Institutional Class
11.34%35.49%4.54%20.73%-5.67%6.65%8.43%13.57%-10.23%29.98%

Correlation

The correlation between PZVMX and PZIEX is 0.14, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.33

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2015

0.40

Over the past year, the correlation between PZVMX and PZIEX has dropped to 0.14 - well below their long-term average of 0.40, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PZVMX vs. PZIEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PZVMX
PZVMX Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
PZVMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PZVMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
PZVMX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
PZVMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
PZVMX Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

PZIEX
PZIEX Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
PZIEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PZIEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
PZIEX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
PZIEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
PZIEX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PZVMX vs. PZIEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pzena Mid Cap Value Fund (PZVMX) and Pzena Emerging Markets Value Fund Institutional Class (PZIEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PZVMXPZIEXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.28

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.43

1.96

-0.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.90

5.16

-1.26

PZVMX vs. PZIEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PZVMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is lower than the PZIEX Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PZVMX and PZIEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PZVMX vs. PZIEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PZVMX drawdown since its inception was -54.06%, which is greater than PZIEX's maximum drawdown of -44.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PZVMX and PZIEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PZVMXPZIEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.06%

-44.59%

-9.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.13%

-12.79%

-1.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.13%

-16.40%

-6.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.33%

-24.22%

+0.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.06%

-44.59%

-9.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.57%

-7.07%

+6.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.36%

-9.54%

+1.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.20%

4.86%

+0.34%

Volatility

PZVMX vs. PZIEX - Volatility Comparison

Pzena Mid Cap Value Fund (PZVMX) has a higher volatility of 5.38% compared to Pzena Emerging Markets Value Fund Institutional Class (PZIEX) at 4.14%. This indicates that PZVMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PZIEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PZVMXPZIEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.38%

4.14%

+1.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.39%

13.76%

-0.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.22%

15.96%

+3.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.90%

14.92%

+5.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.07%

15.33%

+9.74%

PZVMX vs. PZIEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PZVMX has a 1.32% expense ratio, which is higher than PZIEX's 1.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

PZVMX vs. PZIEX - Dividend Comparison

PZVMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.54%, less than PZIEX's 4.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PZIEX
Pzena Emerging Markets Value Fund Institutional Class
4.32%4.81%7.38%5.79%2.08%2.79%1.28%6.32%1.28%1.41%0.98%2.23%
PZVMX
Pzena Mid Cap Value Fund
3.54%4.27%18.45%8.81%15.42%9.39%2.13%1.23%2.59%2.55%0.58%3.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


PZVMX and PZIEX have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PZVMX has higher volatility (5.38%) compared to PZIEX (4.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PZVMX dropped -54.06% vs PZIEX's -44.59%.

PZIEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PZVMX and PZIEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer